bisectable6

query

my %h = Hash;

result

Bisecting: 2698 revisions left to test after this (roughly 11 steps)
[d21d8abbd2f8a646dd8376433ed901bfd730370b] Merge pull request #947 from FCO/uint-match-unsigned-int
»»»»» Testing d21d8abbd2f8a646dd8376433ed901bfd730370b
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f9ebd24666d344eb0590df0ff4cdd42f76f07a22
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed.  Did you forget a .new?
  in block <unit> at /tmp/iAhJsF9w52 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0d8624d425ba5ff06625812678b6e87351ce614d
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed.  Did you forget a .new?
  in block <unit> at /tmp/iAhJsF9w52 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing ec0258a44d9878d613a76bfa7518c60f04425dff
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d71bf1e90cce11e71cded531a383fb6299ebac78
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 8096da0f04432251881181b93f0da7befca90000
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed.  Did you forget a .new?
  in block <unit> at /tmp/iAhJsF9w52 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0bb2dbc0aefccc7cfea7b96e816e4c23ad31aba6
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed.  Did you forget a .new?
  in block <unit> at /tmp/iAhJsF9w52 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 2f69be91446ab3f3ed85c54f741cf701b8cba8d5
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed.  Did you forget a .new?
  in block <unit> at /tmp/iAhJsF9w52 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0fdb9e4e402fa00978a3c489407766740c1df03a
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f230224d27bb6d47746de836113b07bf9a4ebcc0
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0ee3b7dabbc85f1dfac1a128deaa62df090ef74b
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing c13d0a4c065283cbdae635a57417d81f2bb0d0a7
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2f69be91446ab3f3ed85c54f741cf701b8cba8d5 is the first new commit
commit 2f69be91446ab3f3ed85c54f741cf701b8cba8d5
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@dijkmat.nl>
Date:   Mon Jan 23 17:48:06 2017 +0100

    Simplify Map/Hash/TypedHash .pairs / .iterator mess
    
    The base of iterating over an Associative class, should always be
    the .iterator method.  All other things, such as .pairs, follow
    from that.

:040000 040000 365cdcafb0d523709fe34e8625586bd2e413756e 984e4476753be6c340e1d6c7bc4fb4259a2e1a80 M	src