Created
February 7, 2011 18:27
-
-
Save PharkMillups/814901 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
09:36 <herewego> Anyone know if you can run multiple reduce phases in a map/reduce query? | |
09:37 <seancribbs> herewego: yes. you can put them together in any combination | |
09:37 <seancribbs> with the constraint, of course, that map phases receive lists of bucket/key[/keydata] | |
09:38 <herewego> so i can run a sort reduce phase after a my own custom reduce phase, correct? | |
09:38 <herewego> feeding one reduce into the other? | |
09:39 <seancribbs> yep | |
09:39 <seancribbs> absolutely | |
09:40 <herewego> ok, cool | |
09:43 <herewego> i'm wondering if maybe it would be advantageous to not do the sort reduce phase | |
in Riak and instead do it after the fact on our web servers | |
09:43 <herewego> just thinking about how i can offload processing from Riak | |
(expensive, high io) to the web servers (cheap, low io) | |
09:45 <seancribbs> herewego: well, once you get to reduce, it's not on disk, it's more in RAM | |
09:46 <seancribbs> so there is the concern that you can exhaust RAM | |
if your collection is too big | |
09:46 <seancribbs> but other than that, it won't make much difference if you do it client side or in Riak | |
09:46 <herewego> right, and i suppose that's an issue on either end | |
09:46 <seancribbs> yes |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment