-
Advanced Manufacturing for Bioengineering Applications
- Dr Scott Lewis (scott.lewis@manchester.ac.uk)
- Using e-beam lithography to create structures for building synthetic biological cells
- learn to use e-beam lithography
- fabricate resist material that works at low res
- use python to convert SEM scans of kidneys to something lithographable
- lithograph it
- fill it with cells?
- Pros
- Really cool
- Bioengineering!
- Nice mix of doing stuff and programming stuff
- Cons
- Bit matieralsy? Not necessarily a bad thing
- What if we can't fabricate the material?
- Not very theoretical
-
Securing the Future of Moore's Law
- Dr Scott Lewis (scott.lewis@manchester.ac.uk)
- Fabricate better materials fo use with Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography
- learn to use EUVL
- make a material based on monte-carlo designs of electron scattering
- test it
- Pros
- Pretty cool
- Cons
- Not as cool as above
-
Quantitation in MALDI Mass Spec
- Dr Adam McMahon (adam.mcmahon@manchester.ac.uk)
- Try to improve precision of MALDI techniques
- Pros
- Pretty cool
- Biophys
- Programming to simulate optics sounds neat
- Christie-based
- Cons
- Don't know much chemistry. Dan might.
- Christie-based
- Not very theoretical
-
Building control and data-acquisition systems for undergrad experiments
- Prof Andrew Murray (andrew.murray@manchester.ac.uk)
- Dr Matthew Harvey (matthew.harvey@manchester.ac.uk)
- Using Arduinos to make undergrad lab not shit
- Pros
- Doing actual work to fix exactly what I always say is wrong with undergrad labs
- Plenty of programming
- Cons
- Andy Murray may still think I'm an idiot
- Not very theoretical
- Not necessarily very physicsy either
-
Fractal structures in urban development
- Dr Ingo Dierking (ingo.dierking@manchester.ac.uk)
- Using fractal dimension techniques to study the shape of urban developments in different continents and different types of cities like rapidly-grown ones versus old ones aaaaugh
- Pros
- Oh my god it's fractals and cities and doing maths to history and it's like all of my favourite things came down and birthed a lab project
- Plenty of opportunity for data-vis, I reckon
- Image processing to automate fractal dimension-counting, maybe?
- Cons
- Does it not having a C next to it mean he doesn't anticipate/want much computering?
-
Measuring the tactile input to the brain from whiskers
- Dr Tom Waigh (t.a.waigh@manchester.ac.uk)
- Using models and video of animal whiskers to understand how they deform and correlating this to electrical impulses to better understand the "world-brain interface"
- Pros
- Programming!
- Biomechanics!
- Cons
- Not theoretical at all
-
Observing Matter/Antimatter differences in Charm
-
Lepton Flavour Violation at LHCb
- Prof Christ Parkes (chris.parkes@cern.ch)
- Different projects but both use ROOT to do particley stuff. First one looks fairly similar to 3rd yar
- Pros
- Can already use ROOT
- Cons
- Means we have to use ROOT (might get to try using python instead though)
- Need to convince Chris we're not still idiots
- Probably quite contested by PPRSC nerds
-
First LHCb Analysis for CERN Open Data Portal
- Prof Chris Parkes (chris.parkes@cern.ch)
- Design a research project for cool teens based on our 3rd-year lab project
- Pros
- Very cool and outreachey
- Have work published on CERN website if successful!
- Cons
- Probably hotly contested by PPRSC nerds
- Need to convince Chris we're not still idiots
-
Stochastic dynamics of cancer evolution
- Dr Tobias Galla (tobias.galla@manchester.ac.uk)
- Michael's thing!
- Pros
- Plenty of cool programming for the stochastic tunnelling
- Cool stats
- Tobias!
- Curing cancer
-
Evolutionary multi-player games in switching environments
- Dr Tobias Galla (tobias.galla@manchester.ac.uk)
- Game theory multi-player thingy, bunch of stochastic stuff
- Pros
- Cool stochastic programming
- Tobias!
- Cons
- Don't understand a bloody word of it
-
Idiots in a queue
- Dr Tobias Galla (tobias.galla@manchester.ac.uk)
- Queueing theory simulations
- Pros
- Qualify us for jobs at disneyland
- Plenty o' programming
- Tobias!
- Opportunity for analytical approach also
- Cons
- Looses out on the Cool Factor
-
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration (M)
- Dr Guoxing Xia (guoxing.xia@manchester.ac.uk)
- Dr Oznur Mete (oznur.mete@manchester.ac.uk)
- Analysing and simulating physics in wakefield accelerators
- Pros
- Bunch of different aspects to study
- Exceedingly cool next-gen-accelerator stuff
- Analytical and programming segments
- Cons
- Wasn't planning on taking Frontiers, might not have to though
-
Particle-in-cell computer simulation of a plasma (M)
- Prof Philippa Browning (p.browning@manchester.ac.uk)
- Simulating a plasma
- Pros
- Fairly straightforward-sounding model-construction in language of our choice
- Philippa's pretty cool
- Cons
- Don't know much about plasmas
-
"Avalanche" modelling of solar flares
- Prof Philippa Browning (p.browning@manchester.ac.uk)
- Simulating circumstances leading to solar flares
- Pros
- Statistical model programming's always fun
- Philippa's pretty cool
- Cons
- Don't know much about plasmas
-
Time evolution in quantum mechanics and high frequency stabilisation of atoms (M)
- Prof Niels Walet (niels.walet@manchester.ac.uk)
- Using FFTs to time-evolve quantum systems computationally
- Pros
- FFTs are very cool
- Plenty o' programming
- Niels is scary but I like him
-
Quantum Chaology (M)
- Prof Niels Walet (niels.walet@manchester.ac.uk)
- Computationally studying two different models for quantum chaos
- Pros
- Sweet jesus this is a sexy-looking project
- Plenty o' programming
- Niels is scary but I like him
- Let me re-emphasise how sexy this looks
- Cons
- It also looks completely terrifying
-
Modelling The Variable Radio Emission from Star Forming Regions In Our Galaxy (A)
- Prof Gary Fuller (g.fuller@manchester.ac.uk)
- Identifying and modelling the way stars of different types emit radio
- Pros
- Sounds pretty useful
- Opportunity for fun data-vis?
- Cons
- Gary (might well be better one-on-one though)
-
Water flow in confined nano graphene channels
- Dr Jichen Li (j.c.li@manchester.ac.uk)
- Simulating water diffusion through graphene channels of various shapes and sizes in order to understand biological nanostructues
- Pros
- As ways to apply nanoscience to biology go, this is a pretty cool one
- Graphene is pretty sexy too
- Cons
- Unclear if actual physical graphene is involved
- Full year only
-
Predicting and understanding of heart diseases and heart vessels problems
- Dr Jichen Li (j.c.li@Manchester.ac.uk)
- Prof HG Zhang (h.zhang- 3@manchester.ac.uk)
- Fouriering ECG graphs to predict heart defects
- Pros
- Medical awesomeness
- Would love to try programming with fouriers
- May discover heart defects in selves