Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable

Whateverable/query

Created April 5, 2019 10:46
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Whateverable/923c2a2f04dce12d6f8f8220d0e66f67 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Whateverable/923c2a2f04dce12d6f8f8220d0e66f67 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
bisectable6
Raw
query
my %h; %h.push("a"|"b", "a")
Raw
result
Bisecting: 4740 revisions left to test after this (roughly 12 steps)
[055cf7570306f527985d3d3e86de34e6600cb310] We have signal in JVM; re-order and remove #?jvm.
»»»»» Testing 055cf7570306f527985d3d3e86de34e6600cb310
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '&call'; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|67512640>} (Method+{<anon|6751264...)
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 8b40d1b14de0affe8b53df89a48f13227ddfbf05
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|69751760>} (Method+{<anon|6975176...)
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 1922828a86b9ce3c7d0e073fd1167075d088f9b7
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|49971712>} (Method+{<anon|4997171...)
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 57df3dd998648dd78372fe1bc5be9d5d0cdbb038
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|58743216>} (Method+{<anon|5874321...)
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 90b584afd4a33f24dfa8b486d490f93178f53ea3
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|61342736>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 2d91f08585bcd75aabcd2513103a7eb985df5689
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|60931728>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing b8a75b95b065cc8d4ff3aa0bc0a9997cb2c13520
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|63404928>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 16c5fc7ab4a522a9702f6b922dfb731f5c6564a2
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|74268016>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 9441bb29b54f43501981f9efb47cc94d1bfcb38c
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|78682000>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 1bdb784b49e198b259dfe98387f5578d3ec28838
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|61829264>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d031905ed4c7167982524b24c47b6446c839f9fa
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|80285680>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 07fecb52eb1fd07397659f19a5cf36dc61f84053
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|77484624>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Type check failed in binding &call; expected Callable but got Method+{<anon|73275184>}
in block <unit> at /tmp/dPJLMbeBTn line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
07fecb52eb1fd07397659f19a5cf36dc61f84053 is the first new commit
commit 07fecb52eb1fd07397659f19a5cf36dc61f84053
Author: Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
Date: Fri Dec 25 23:13:46 2015 -0600
I appreciate the thanks, but once is enough
:040000 040000 a021c33002ff4b5b46ebcb9b0293bb27319273d1 f3eb869e39284eecab14e13dc913b0a3e1cdfd3e M docs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment