Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@admariner
Forked from ruvnet/HLC.md
Created April 2, 2024 04:48
Show Gist options
  • Save admariner/b0a9e76ffa11586d29089e80e0a914af to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save admariner/b0a9e76ffa11586d29089e80e0a914af to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
f763620dbb895ea6410aed952bfa4cf5

For autonomous reasoning, logic, and self-reflection, a promising approach is to use a combination of Graph Attention Networks (GATs) and higher-order logic frameworks like Hypergraph Lambda Calculus (HLC) or Dependent Type Theory (DTT).

Here's why this combination can be effective:

  1. Graph Attention Networks (GATs) for Reasoning:

    • GATs can be used to model the reasoning process over a knowledge graph or a logical structure.
    • The attention mechanism in GATs allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the graph for a given reasoning task.
    • GATs can capture complex relationships and dependencies between concepts, propositions, and inference rules.
    • The self-attention mechanism in GATs enables the model to assign different importance to different logical connections and reasoning paths.
  2. Hypergraph Lambda Calculus (HLC) for Higher-Order Logic:

    • HLC is a higher-order logic framework that extends lambda calculus with hypergraphs.
    • It allows for the representation and manipulation of complex logical expressions and proofs.
    • HLC can express higher-order concepts, such as functions, predicates, and quantifiers, which are essential for autonomous reasoning and self-reflection.
    • The hypergraph structure in HLC enables the modeling of multi-way relationships and dependencies between logical entities.
  3. Dependent Type Theory (DTT) for Self-Reflection:

    • DTT is a type theory that incorporates dependent types, which allow types to depend on values.
    • It provides a powerful framework for expressing and reasoning about properties and constraints of logical systems.
    • DTT can be used to define and verify the consistency and correctness of the reasoning process itself.
    • The dependent types in DTT enable the model to reflect on its own reasoning steps and ensure the validity of the inferences made.

To implement this approach in a Google Colab notebook using PyTorch Geometric, you can follow these steps:

  1. Define your logical language and inference rules using HLC or DTT.
  2. Represent your logical expressions and proofs as hypergraphs, with nodes representing logical entities (e.g., propositions, predicates, functions) and hyperedges representing logical relationships and inference steps.
  3. Implement a custom GAT model using PyTorch Geometric's GATConv layer to operate on the hypergraph representation of your logical system.
  4. Train the GAT model to perform reasoning tasks, such as proof search, theorem proving, or logical inference, by optimizing it to assign high attention scores to valid reasoning paths and low scores to invalid ones.
  5. Use DTT to define and check the consistency and correctness of the reasoning process, ensuring that the model's inferences adhere to the logical rules and constraints.
  6. Evaluate the trained model on new reasoning tasks and assess its ability to generate valid and insightful logical conclusions.

Here's a simplified example of how you can define a custom GAT model for reasoning using PyTorch Geometric:

import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torch_geometric.nn import GATConv

class ReasoningGAT(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, in_channels, hidden_channels, out_channels, num_heads, num_layers):
        super(ReasoningGAT, self).__init__()
        self.conv_layers = nn.ModuleList([
            GATConv(in_channels, hidden_channels, heads=num_heads, concat=True),
            *[GATConv(hidden_channels * num_heads, hidden_channels, heads=num_heads, concat=True) for _ in range(num_layers - 2)],
            GATConv(hidden_channels * num_heads, out_channels, heads=1, concat=False)
        ])

    def forward(self, x, edge_index):
        for conv in self.conv_layers:
            x = conv(x, edge_index)
            x = nn.functional.elu(x)
        return x

Remember to adapt the model architecture, training procedure, and evaluation metrics based on your specific logical language, inference rules, and reasoning tasks.

Combining GATs with higher-order logic frameworks like HLC and DTT provides a powerful foundation for autonomous reasoning, logic, and self-reflection. This approach enables the model to perform complex logical inferences, capture intricate relationships between logical entities, and ensure the consistency and correctness of its reasoning process. By leveraging the attention mechanism of GATs and the expressive power of higher-order logic, this combination can lead to more advanced and reliable autonomous reasoning systems.

Incorporating a Hypergraph Lambda Calculus (HLC) based model as part of a larger mixture of experts system could provide several benefits and enhance the overall capabilities of the model:

  1. Improved Reasoning Capabilities:

    • HLC's higher-order logic and lambda calculus foundations enable more sophisticated reasoning capabilities.
    • The model can handle complex dependencies, abstractions, and quantification, allowing it to perform advanced inference and deduction tasks.
    • This can complement other experts in the mixture that may focus on pattern recognition, data-driven learning, or specialized domain knowledge.
  2. Enhanced Expressiveness:

    • HLC's hypergraph-based representation allows modeling complex structures and relationships that may be difficult to capture with traditional graph-based or vector-based representations.
    • The model can express and reason about intricate domain knowledge, logical rules, and constraints.
    • This expressiveness can enable the mixture of experts to tackle a wider range of problems and handle more complex and structured data.
  3. Logical Consistency and Interpretability:

    • HLC's grounding in formal logic and type theory provides a principled framework for ensuring logical consistency and coherence.
    • The reasoning process in HLC is explicit and transparent, as it follows well-defined logical rules and inference steps.
    • This can make the model's decisions and outputs more interpretable and explainable, which is valuable in domains where transparency and trust are important.
  4. Generalization and Compositionality:

    • HLC's ability to express higher-order abstractions and perform compositional reasoning can enable better generalization to novel situations and unseen data.
    • The model can break down complex problems into smaller, reusable components and combine them in novel ways.
    • This compositionality can allow the mixture of experts to handle a wider range of tasks and adapt to new domains more effectively.
  5. Integration with Other Experts:

    • HLC's hypergraph-based representation can provide a common language for integrating and combining knowledge from different experts in the mixture.
    • The logical and structured nature of HLC can facilitate knowledge sharing, consistency checking, and joint reasoning among experts.
    • This can lead to more coherent and synergistic collaboration within the mixture of experts, leveraging the strengths of each individual model.
  6. Scalability and Efficiency:

    • HLC's declarative and modular nature can enable efficient reasoning and inference processes.
    • The hypergraph representation allows for parallel and distributed processing, as different parts of the hypergraph can be handled independently.
    • This scalability can be beneficial when dealing with large-scale knowledge bases, complex reasoning tasks, or real-time applications.
  7. Potential for Learning and Adaptation:

    • While HLC is primarily a logical and symbolic framework, it can be combined with learning techniques to enable adaptation and improvement over time.
    • The mixture of experts can incorporate learning algorithms that adjust the hypergraph structure, refine the logical rules, or learn new abstractions based on data and feedback.
    • This learning capability can make the HLC-based expert more flexible and adaptable to changing environments and user needs.

Overall, incorporating an HLC-based model into a mixture of experts can bring enhanced reasoning capabilities, expressiveness, interpretability, generalization, and scalability to the system. It can complement and synergize with other experts, enabling the mixture to tackle more complex and diverse problems while maintaining logical consistency and transparency.

Display the source blob
Display the rendered blob
Raw
{
"cells": [
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {
"id": "view-in-github",
"colab_type": "text"
},
"source": [
"<a href=\"https://colab.research.google.com/gist/ruvnet/f763620dbb895ea6410aed952bfa4cf5/notebook.ipynb\" target=\"_parent\"><img src=\"https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg\" alt=\"Open In Colab\"/></a>"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {
"id": "OrY3oAFD7VfG"
},
"source": [
"# Autonomous Reasoning with Graph Attention Networks and Higher-Order Logic\n",
"by @rUv, cause I could.\n",
"\n",
"This notebook demonstrates a basic implementation of autonomous reasoning using Graph Attention Networks (GATs) and higher-order logic frameworks like Hypergraph Lambda Calculus (HLC) or Dependent Type Theory (DTT).\n",
"\n",
"## Techniques and Opportunities\n",
"\n",
"- GATs are used to model the reasoning process over a knowledge graph or logical structure.\n",
"- The attention mechanism in GATs allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the graph for a given reasoning task.\n",
"- Higher-order logic frameworks like HLC and DTT provide a powerful foundation for expressing and reasoning about complex logical concepts and proofs.\n",
"- The combination of GATs and higher-order logic enables the model to perform intricate logical inferences, capture relationships between logical entities, and ensure the consistency and correctness of its reasoning process.\n",
"- This approach opens up opportunities for creating autonomous agents capable of reasoning, decision-making, and executing complex workflows.\n",
"- By leveraging GATs and higher-order logic, it becomes possible to develop autonomous employees that can perform tasks, adapt to changing conditions, and make intelligent decisions based on logical reasoning.\n",
"\n",
"## Differences to Other Approaches\n",
"\n",
"- Traditional rule-based systems and first-order logic approaches may struggle with capturing complex relationships and reasoning over large-scale knowledge graphs.\n",
"- Neural network-based approaches like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) or transformers may lack the explicit modeling of logical structures and inference rules.\n",
"- The combination of GATs and higher-order logic provides a more expressive and interpretable framework for autonomous reasoning.\n",
"\n",
"## Benefits and Usages\n",
"\n",
"- Autonomous reasoning with GATs and higher-order logic can be applied to various domains, such as natural language understanding, knowledge base reasoning, and automated theorem proving.\n",
"- This approach can help in generating new insights, discovering hidden relationships, and solving complex logical problems.\n",
"- The interpretability of the reasoning process is enhanced by the explicit modeling of logical structures and the attention mechanism of GATs.\n",
"- Autonomous agents and employees developed using this approach can perform tasks, make decisions, and adapt to dynamic environments based on logical reasoning.\n",
"\n",
"## Functionality\n",
"\n",
"- The notebook includes a basic implementation of a GAT model for reasoning over a hypergraph representation of logical expressions.\n",
"- The model is trained to assign high attention scores to valid reasoning paths and low scores to invalid ones.\n",
"- Higher-order logic frameworks like HLC and DTT are used to define the logical language, inference rules, and consistency checks.\n",
"- Example data is provided to demonstrate the usage of the model for autonomous reasoning tasks."
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "SlbnEYqH7VfB"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Install required libraries\n",
"!pip install torch-geometric"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "kpVDy4Q97VfF"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Import necessary modules\n",
"import torch\n",
"import torch.nn as nn\n",
"from torch_geometric.nn import GATConv\n",
"from torch_geometric.data import Data"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "V2CajxK37VfI"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Define the GAT model for reasoning\n",
"class ReasoningGAT(nn.Module):\n",
" def __init__(self, in_channels, hidden_channels, out_channels, num_heads, num_layers):\n",
" super(ReasoningGAT, self).__init__()\n",
" self.conv_layers = nn.ModuleList([\n",
" GATConv(in_channels, hidden_channels, heads=num_heads, concat=True),\n",
" *[GATConv(hidden_channels * num_heads, hidden_channels, heads=num_heads, concat=True) for _ in range(num_layers - 2)],\n",
" GATConv(hidden_channels * num_heads, out_channels, heads=1, concat=False)\n",
" ])\n",
"\n",
" def forward(self, x, edge_index):\n",
" for conv in self.conv_layers:\n",
" x = conv(x, edge_index)\n",
" x = nn.functional.elu(x)\n",
" return x"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "wzZk6m267VfJ"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Configuration options\n",
"in_channels = 10\n",
"hidden_channels = 64\n",
"out_channels = 2\n",
"num_heads = 4\n",
"num_layers = 3"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "uaL4kaG27VfJ"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Create example data\n",
"def create_example_data():\n",
" # Create example hypergraph data representing logical expressions\n",
" # Each node represents a logical entity (e.g., proposition, predicate, function)\n",
" # Each hyperedge represents a logical relationship or inference step\n",
" # You can define your own logical language and inference rules using HLC or DTT\n",
" # and represent them as a hypergraph\n",
" # For simplicity, we create a random example hypergraph\n",
" num_nodes = 100\n",
" num_edges = 200\n",
" x = torch.randn(num_nodes, in_channels)\n",
" edge_index = torch.randint(0, num_nodes, (2, num_edges))\n",
" data = Data(x=x, edge_index=edge_index)\n",
" return data"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "u_9adWT17VfK"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Create example dataset\n",
"dataset = [create_example_data() for _ in range(10)]"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "jAVylWg57VfK"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Create model instance\n",
"model = ReasoningGAT(in_channels, hidden_channels, out_channels, num_heads, num_layers)"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "PgrCrUzs7VfL"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Training loop\n",
"def train(model, dataset, num_epochs):\n",
" optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.01)\n",
" criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()\n",
"\n",
" for epoch in range(num_epochs):\n",
" for data in dataset:\n",
" optimizer.zero_grad()\n",
" out = model(data.x, data.edge_index)\n",
" # Compute loss based on the validity of the reasoning paths\n",
" # You can define your own loss function based on your specific reasoning tasks\n",
" # and the higher-order logic framework you are using\n",
" # For simplicity, we use a dummy loss function\n",
" loss = criterion(out, torch.randint(0, out_channels, (data.num_nodes,)))\n",
" loss.backward()\n",
" optimizer.step()\n",
" print(f\"Epoch [{epoch+1}/{num_epochs}], Loss: {loss.item():.4f}\")"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "wCdXuIKW7VfL"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Train the model\n",
"num_epochs = 10\n",
"train(model, dataset, num_epochs)"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "EmCb51eD7VfM"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Evaluation and inference\n",
"def evaluate(model, data):\n",
" model.eval()\n",
" with torch.no_grad():\n",
" out = model(data.x, data.edge_index)\n",
" # Perform reasoning tasks and evaluate the model's performance\n",
" # You can define your own evaluation metrics based on your specific reasoning tasks\n",
" # and the higher-order logic framework you are using\n",
" # For simplicity, we just print the model's output\n",
" print(\"Model Output:\")\n",
" print(out)"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {
"id": "eF8Z6Ijp7VfM"
},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"# Evaluate the model on example data\n",
"example_data = create_example_data()\n",
"evaluate(model, example_data)"
]
}
],
"metadata": {
"kernelspec": {
"display_name": "Python 3",
"language": "python",
"name": "python3"
},
"language_info": {
"codemirror_mode": {
"name": "ipython",
"version": 3
},
"file_extension": ".py",
"mimetype": "text/x-python",
"name": "python",
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
"version": "3.8.5"
},
"colab": {
"provenance": [],
"include_colab_link": true
}
},
"nbformat": 4,
"nbformat_minor": 0
}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment