| // this is the background code... | |
| // listen for our browerAction to be clicked | |
| chrome.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function (tab) { | |
| // for the current tab, inject the "inject.js" file & execute it | |
| chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.ib, { | |
| file: 'inject.js' | |
| }); | |
| }); |
| /** | |
| * | |
| */ | |
| package 登陆B站; | |
| import java.awt.image.BufferedImage; | |
| import java.io.IOException; | |
| import javax.imageio.ImageIO; |
People
 :bowtie: |
😄 :smile: |
😆 :laughing: |
|---|---|---|
😊 :blush: |
😃 :smiley: |
:relaxed: |
😏 :smirk: |
😍 :heart_eyes: |
😘 :kissing_heart: |
😚 :kissing_closed_eyes: |
😳 :flushed: |
😌 :relieved: |
😆 :satisfied: |
😁 :grin: |
😉 :wink: |
😜 :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: |
😝 :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: |
😀 :grinning: |
😗 :kissing: |
😙 :kissing_smiling_eyes: |
😛 :stuck_out_tongue: |
When the directory structure of your Node.js application (not library!) has some depth, you end up with a lot of annoying relative paths in your require calls like:
const Article = require('../../../../app/models/article');Those suck for maintenance and they're ugly.
| <?php | |
| /** | |
| * Catch php output buffering data over jQuery AJAX | |
| * | |
| * @author: Sohel Rana (me.sohelrana@gmail.com) | |
| * @author url: https://blog.sohelrana.me | |
| * @link: https://blog.sohelrana.me/catch-php-output-buffering-data-jquery-ajax/ | |
| * @licence MIT | |
| */ |
| package niochat; | |
| import java.net.*; | |
| import java.nio.*; | |
| import java.nio.channels.*; | |
| import java.io.IOException; | |
| import java.util.*; | |
| public class NiochatServer implements Runnable { | |
| private final int port; |
| cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.7) | |
| project(hotspot) | |
| include_directories( | |
| src/hotspot/cpu | |
| src/hotspot/os | |
| src/hotspot/os_cpu | |
| src/hotspot/share | |
| src/hotspot/share/precompiled | |
| src/hotspot/share/include | |
| src/java.base/unix/native/include |
| #!/usr/bin/env ruby | |
| # encoding: utf-8 | |
| # By Uğur Özyılmazel, @vigobronx | @ugurozyilmazel | |
| # http://vigodome.com | http://ugur.ozyilmazel.com | http://github.com/vigo | |
| def get_paged_memory_usage(match_string, paging=4096) | |
| mvar = 3 | |
| if match_string.split(/[^\w]/).length > 1 | |
| mvar = 4 |
| import lombok.Data; | |
| import org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.*; | |
| import org.apache.poi.ss.util.CellRangeAddress; | |
| import org.apache.poi.ss.util.SheetUtil; | |
| import org.apache.poi.xssf.usermodel.XSSFSheet; | |
| import org.apache.poi.xssf.usermodel.helpers.ColumnHelper; | |
| import java.awt.font.FontRenderContext; | |
| import java.awt.font.TextAttribute; | |
| import java.awt.font.TextLayout; |
| /* | |
| There is an AST (Abstract syntax tree) in JSON format. | |
| AST represents Excel spreadsheet formula. | |
| Is it possible in JavaScript to make RPN (Reverse Polish Notation) faster than AST? | |
| AST evaluation is recusive and RPN evaluation is iterative. | |
| But in any case, AST evaluation is faster despite recursion. | |
| I guess that the main problem is in using dynamic js arrays to emulate stack. | |
| Would RPN win if it was written in C/C++? | |