| ~/I/pandarus git:master ❯❯❯ ./build-and-install-gem | |
| ++ dirname ./build-and-install-gem | |
| + cd . | |
| + rm -f './clients/ruby/lib/pandarus/models/*.rb' | |
| + mvn clean package scala:run -Dlauncher=ruby-codegen | |
| [INFO] Scanning for projects... | |
| [INFO] | |
| [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |
| [INFO] Building client-generator 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT |
| <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | |
| xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd"> | |
| <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> | |
| <groupId>com.wordnik</groupId> | |
| <artifactId>client-generator</artifactId> | |
| <packaging>jar</packaging> | |
| <name>client-generator</name> | |
| <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version> | |
| <prerequisites> | |
| <maven>2.2.0</maven> |
| -rw-r--r-- 1 duane staff 6938 Sep 13 14:29 001.create_books.sql | |
| drwx------+ 54 duane staff 1836 Jan 29 09:30 Desktop | |
| drwx------+ 17 duane staff 578 Jan 28 16:03 Documents | |
| drwx------+ 65 duane staff 2210 Feb 21 14:15 Downloads | |
| drwx------@ 17 duane staff 578 Feb 21 15:31 Dropbox | |
| drwx------@ 61 duane staff 2074 Dec 3 09:21 Library | |
| drwx------+ 3 duane staff 102 Jan 30 2013 Movies | |
| drwx------+ 4 duane staff 136 Jan 30 2013 Music | |
| drwx------+ 6 duane staff 204 Aug 9 2013 Pictures | |
| lrwxr-xr-x 1 duane staff 29 Oct 15 2012 Projects -> /Users/duane/Dropbox/Projects |
| function is_git_dir() { | |
| git rev-parse --is-inside-git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ -d .git ] | |
| return $? | |
| } | |
| function is_canvas_root() { | |
| CANVAS_IN_README=$(head -1 README.md 2>/dev/null | grep 'Canvas LMS') | |
| [[ "$CANVAS_IN_README" != "" ]] && is_git_dir | |
| return $? | |
| } |
I want internet service providers classified as common carriers. It's good for entrepreneurs, it's good for Americans, it's good for communities. It might not be good for a handful of very wealthy, aging media conglomerates. I'm ok with that. I will support you, as our appointed policy makers, in making a decision that they may not be happy with. Please continue down the path of Title II classification.
-- Duane Johnson Submitted to the FCC September 9th, 2014
| docker rm -f changinx | |
| docker run -d --name changinx \ | |
| -p 80:80 \ | |
| -v /r/logs:/var/log/nginx \ | |
| -v /r/conf:/conf \ | |
| wordtree/changinx | |
| docker rm -f beanstalkd | |
| docker run -d --name beanstalkd \ | |
| -p 11300:11300 \ |
| require 'pandarus' | |
| $p = { | |
| token: "YOUR_TOKEN", | |
| prefix: "http://localhost:3000/api" | |
| } | |
| $c = Pandarus::Client.new($p) | |
| # $c.retrieve_assignment_overridden_dates_for_quizzes(1) | |
| result = $c.list_submissions_for_multiple_assignments_sections(1, {assignment_ids: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], student_ids: "all", include: ["assignment"]}) |
While the UTA provides increasingly better transit for our residents, and cabs provide a useful service, there is still a wide gap between "drive-yourselfers" and "public transiters". Shared rides with a hybrid for-pay model (à la Lyft) is an important new option for Salt Lake City that reduces traffic congestion and pollution. Please keep this option affordable as we explore new and innovative solutions to Utah's transit needs.
I'm curious if there has been any attempt to calculate a "scan quality" measure for the OCRed books in the archive. I deal frequently with data from the period 1700-1830 and I notice a wide variety in quality. Ideally, I'd like a "scanquality" property that I could set parameters for in a search.
I've implemented something like this for books that I've downloaded from archive.org, but it seems like it would be useful for all patrons of archive.org to have this metadata. Has implementing an algorithm like this been talked about? How interesting is it, and if interesting, with whom should I speak to develop something like this?
| /* | |
| Some of the pains I'm experiencing in testing JS: | |
| - subject "appears out of nowhere" (as do "describe", "it", and "assert") | |
| - it isn't clear what methods are available on subject | |
| - stubs must happen outside of tests | |
| - stubs take up a lot of space in test files | |
| - stub methods require the developer to think about whether it's a class or component | |
| - stubs require outside-scope closure capture of variable to be used in tests | |
| - it isn't lexically clear where the stubbing "ends", e.g. the life cycle of a stubbed class method | |
| - mountComponent doesn't automatically unmount? |