Based off of: http://docs.sequelizejs.com/en/1.7.0/articles/express/
Create and initialize your a directory for your Express application.
$ mkdir sequelize-demo
Javascript files from the examples folder (such as OrbitControls) are not CommonJS or ES Modules, but they can still be used in Webpack bundles:
In package.json
:
"dependencies": {
"three": "0.84.0",
"webpack": "2.4.1"
}
This is an unofficial documentation for the internal lolesports.com api.
This documentation is uncomplete and currently only show all information I got so far. Please help me complete and correct this documentation.
The domain for the intern lolesports.com api is http://api.lolesports.com/api/.
import React, { useRef, useEffect, memo } from 'react' | |
import { useRouter } from 'next/router' | |
const ROUTES_TO_RETAIN = ['/dashboard', '/top', '/recent', 'my-posts'] | |
const App = ({ Component, pageProps }) => { | |
const router = useRouter() | |
const retainedComponents = useRef({}) | |
const isRetainableRoute = ROUTES_TO_RETAIN.includes(router.asPath) |
왜 svelte가 Vue 보다 더 좋은가? By John Hannah
- 내(박성렬)가 Svelte에 관심을 가지게 된 이유.
- 글이 주장하는 바는 대략 세 가지
- 구문이 간결하다.
- Vue보다 빠르다(bootup time, main thread cost)
- 용량이 Vue보다 적다(total byte weight)
/** | |
* UTF-8 형식 문자열의 바이트 크기 계산 | |
* UTF-8 문자는 1바이트부터 4바이트를 사용하며 범위별로 다른 비트 패턴을 사용한다. | |
* | |
* 유니코드 문자를 UTF-8 형식으로 표현할 때 | |
* 7비트로 표현 가능한 U+0000 ~ U+007F 에 해당하는 문자는 1바이트, | |
* 11비트 표현 가능한 U+0080 ~ U+07FF 에 해당하는 문자는 2바이트, | |
* 16비트 표현 가능한 U+0800 ~ U+FFFF 에 해당하는 문자는 3바이트, | |
* 를 각각 사용한다. | |
* (4바이트로 표현되는 문자는 거의 사용되지 않으므로 무시한다) |
/* | |
* object.watch polyfill | |
* | |
* 2012-04-03 | |
* | |
* By Eli Grey, http://eligrey.com | |
* Public Domain. | |
* NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. | |
*/ |
Firstly, Create React App is good. But it's a very rigid CLI, primarily designed for projects that require very little to no configuration. This makes it great for beginners and simple projects but unfortunately, this means that it's pretty non-extensible. Despite the involvement from big names and a ton of great devs, it has left me wanting a much better developer experience with a lot more polish when it comes to hot reloading, babel configuration, webpack configuration, etc. It's definitely simple and good, but not amazing.
Now, compare that experience to Next.js which for starters has a much larger team behind it provided by a world-class company (Vercel) who are all financially dedicated to making it the best DX you could imagine to build any React application. Next.js is the 💣-diggity. It has amazing docs, great support, can grow with your requirements into SSR or static site generation, etc.
When the directory structure of your Node.js application (not library!) has some depth, you end up with a lot of annoying relative paths in your require calls like:
const Article = require('../../../../app/models/article');
Those suck for maintenance and they're ugly.