designatednerd

/*
 Some playing around with a playground in Swift to try and figure out how to make Funcitonal
 stuff more readable. Initial example from:
 http://www.raywenderlich.com/82599/swift-functional-programming-tutorial
 */

import Foundation

let words = [ "Cat", "Chicken", "fish", "Dog", "Mouse", "Guinea Pig", "monkey"]

designatednerd

package com.[my package].rule;

import org.junit.Assume;
import org.junit.rules.TestRule;
import org.junit.runner.Description;
import org.junit.runners.model.Statement;
import timber.log.Timber;

import java.lang.annotation.*;
import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;

designatednerd

/*
The most horrendous test case I've ever found in client code, and a great example 
of why "Your code must have X% test coverage" is a dangerous way to evaluate 
whether something is properly tested. 

Class prefixes have been changed to CLT (for Client) to protect the guilty. All
else is from the original. 
*/

- (void)testShouldLogResponseOnSuccess

designatednerd

- (BOOL)doesStringContainSpecificString:(NSString *)passedInString 
{
     NSRange rangeOfString = [passedInString rangeOfString:@"a string"];
     if (rangeOfString.location != NSNotFound) {
          //String was found, do stuff
          return YES;
     } //else string was not found, don't bother
     
     return NO;
}

designatednerd

FOUNDATION_EXPORT const struct DNSUserDefaults {
    __unsafe_unretained NSString *hasRunBefore;
    __unsafe_unretained NSString *hasMadeInAppPurchase;
} DNSUserDefaults;

designatednerd

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am designatednerd on github.
• I am designatednerd (https://keybase.io/designatednerd) on keybase.
• I have a public key whose fingerprint is 636E F994 2D18 33BB 86A3 97C4 F94C 162F 31C3 B0E1

To claim this, I am signing this object: