git clone git@github.com:YOUR-USERNAME/YOUR-FORKED-REPO.git
cd into/cloned/fork-repo
git remote add upstream git://github.com/ORIGINAL-DEV-USERNAME/REPO-YOU-FORKED-FROM.git
git fetch upstream
/** | |
* loadJSONP( url, hollaback [, context] ) -> Null | |
* - url (String): URL to data resource. | |
* - hollaback (Function): Function to call when data is successfully loaded, | |
* it receives one argument: the data. | |
* - context (Object): Context to invoke the hollaback function in. | |
* | |
* Load external data through a JSONP interface. | |
* | |
* ### Examples |
<?php | |
$fileName = $_FILES['afile']['name']; | |
$fileType = $_FILES['afile']['type']; | |
$fileContent = file_get_contents($_FILES['afile']['tmp_name']); | |
$dataUrl = 'data:' . $fileType . ';base64,' . base64_encode($fileContent); | |
$json = json_encode(array( | |
'name' => $fileName, | |
'type' => $fileType, | |
'dataUrl' => $dataUrl, |
I have always struggled with getting all the various share buttons from Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, Pinterest, etc to align correctly and to not look like a tacky explosion of buttons. Seeing a number of sites rolling their own share buttons with counts, for example The Next Web I decided to look into the various APIs on how to simply return the share count.
If you want to roll up all of these into a single jQuery plugin check out Sharrre
Many of these API calls and methods are undocumented, so anticipate that they will change in the future. Also, if you are planning on rolling these out across a site I would recommend creating a simple endpoint that periodically caches results from all of the APIs so that you are not overloading the services will requests.
#!/bin/sh | |
### | |
# SOME COMMANDS WILL NOT WORK ON macOS (Sierra or newer) | |
# For Sierra or newer, see https://github.com/mathiasbynens/dotfiles/blob/master/.macos | |
### | |
# Alot of these configs have been taken from the various places | |
# on the web, most from here | |
# https://github.com/mathiasbynens/dotfiles/blob/5b3c8418ed42d93af2e647dc9d122f25cc034871/.osx |
/* normal flexbox */ | |
.flexbox .flex-container { | |
display: -webkit-flex; | |
display: -moz-flex; | |
display: -ms-flex; | |
display: flex; | |
} | |
.flexbox .flex-container.vertical { | |
display: -webkit-flex; | |
display: -moz-flex; |
var runner = require('child_process'); | |
runner.exec( | |
'php -r \'include("settings.php"); print json_encode($databases);\'', | |
function (err, stdout, stderr) { | |
var connection = JSON.parse(stdout).default.default; | |
console.log(connection.database); | |
// result botdb | |
} |
/*! = $rembase: 14px | |
-------------------------------------------------------------- | |
* hmtl { font-size: 87.5%; } | |
* body { font-size: 14px; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1; } | |
* 4px 0.28571429rem | |
* 8px 0.571428571rem | |
* 12px 0.857142857rem | |
* 13px 0.928571429rem | |
* 14px 1rem | |
* 16px 1.142857143rem |
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the secure
flag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection.
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying
I've done the same process every couple years since 2013 (Mountain Lion, Mavericks, High Sierra, Catalina) and I updated the Gist each time I've done it.
I kinda regret for not using something like Boxen (or anything similar) to automate the process, but TBH I only actually needed to these steps once every couple years...