I hereby claim:
- I am djmunro on github.
- I am dmunro (https://keybase.io/dmunro) on keybase.
- I have a public key ASAHTnjurd7-RPY113f8jK7m9PVKV5oiDb4LPocM35OsJgo
To claim this, I am signing this object:
[-64, 0, 63.5, None] | |
[0, 50, 100, None] | |
[3, 15, 28.5, None] | |
[0, 1, 2, 3] | |
#I have 4 lists like what's seen above. I want a generator, when I call it will return the count of items at 1st, then 2nd,... index | |
#so from the above example, I want the following outpout | |
#>> next(), 4 |
I hereby claim:
To claim this, I am signing this object:
import asyncio | |
import ctypes | |
import sys | |
import threading | |
from asyncio.base_futures import _PENDING | |
from functools import wraps | |
from typing import Callable, List, Generic, TypeVar | |
import aioprocessing |
<!DOCTYPE html> | |
<html lang="en"> | |
<head> | |
<meta charset="UTF-8" /> | |
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" /> | |
<title>Document</title> | |
<script | |
src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.5.0.min.js" | |
integrity="sha256-xNzN2a4ltkB44Mc/Jz3pT4iU1cmeR0FkXs4pru/JxaQ=" | |
crossorigin="anonymous" |
Any top-level comment on pull request ought be tagged with one of four emojis:
❓ for a non-blocking comment that asks for clarification. The pull request author must answer the question before the pull request is merged, but does not have to wait for the comment author to re-review before merging.
🎨 for a non-blocking comment that proposes a refactor or cleanup. The pull request author does not have to address the comment for the pull request to merge.
Request Changes
review, and is responsible for re-reviewing once the pull request author has addressed the issue.
😻 for a comment that compliments the author for their work.