ducc

package de.zh32.slp;
 
import com.google.gson.Gson;
import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
import java.io.DataInputStream;
import java.io.DataOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.OutputStream;

ducc

import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
import com.google.common.base.Splitter;
import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
import org.bukkit.Bukkit;
import org.bukkit.ChatColor;
import org.bukkit.OfflinePlayer;
import org.bukkit.entity.Player;
import org.bukkit.scoreboard.*;

import java.util.*;

ducc

##################
# Privacy Settings
##################

# Privacy: Let apps use my advertising ID: Disable
Set-ItemProperty -Path HKCU:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\AdvertisingInfo -Name Enabled -Type DWord -Value 0
# To Restore:
#Set-ItemProperty -Path HKCU:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\AdvertisingInfo -Name Enabled -Type DWord -Value 1
# Privacy: SmartScreen Filter for Store Apps: Disable
Set-ItemProperty -Path HKCU:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\AppHost -Name EnableWebContentEvaluation -Type DWord -Value 0

ducc

I spent a while writing this out, so please give it a read and try this out. You'll thank me soon!

Explenations

Why shouldn't you be using static?

Static is not evil, however you are using it wrong. This is known as 'static abuse'. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1766715/when-not-to-use-the-static-keyword-in-java http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7026507/why-are-static-variables-considered-evil

I would highly advise checking out the first 20 or so of the new boston's java tutorials. Some may disagree, however I believe that they are very helpful

ducc

Bot prefixes:

• spongybot: #
• wee.bot: `
• beta_bot: !
• guster.conch: -
• chester.bot.v2: $
• infodousbot: ~
• ptp.bot: .
• pangeabot: @
• phobiaknown: %

ducc

public abstract class CommandExecutor {

  private final String command, permission; // you can group variables of the same type together like this
  private final boolean console, player;
  private final int length;
  
  /*
  Instantiating the variables inside of the constructor instead of using a setter. If you do not want all of these
  to be set (e.g. if some are optional) you can have multiple constructors.
  */

ducc

import java.util.*;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReadWriteLock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
import java.util.function.Consumer;

public class CommandBus {
​
    private final Map<String, List<Consumer<String[]>>> handlers = new HashMap<>();
    private final ReadWriteLock lock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock();
​

ducc

package main

import (
	"reflect"
)

type MyEnum struct {
	SOME_VALUE       string
	SOME_OTHER_THING string
}

ducc

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>

    <!-- this section is details about your project -->
    <groupId>me.monitor</groupId>
    <artifactId>monitoringbotv04</artifactId>
    <version>1.0</version> <!-- this is the version of your project, can be set to anything -->

ducc

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am sponges on github.
• I am sponges (https://keybase.io/sponges) on keybase.
• I have a public key whose fingerprint is 61CA 9260 0F91 EA95 A4B4 DA4E BBD7 7FAD ABE2 B9EA

To claim this, I am signing this object: