bisectable6

query

2018.03,HEAD subset ZInt of Cool where { say $_; True }; sub foo(ZInt(Cool) $Z) {}

result

Bisecting: 124 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps)
[5ad102ea7621f874b84f58649932f34043c87922] Make sure Proc.pid is Nil if we didn't run yet
»»»»» Testing 5ad102ea7621f874b84f58649932f34043c87922
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 9ff655645b5f8e5250cbf362e83d8a98278df7fc
»»»»» Script output:
(Iterable)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 5981f81b631e96ee6e1860bd47a949a69ffdc87f
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 54137e8b14bc9b63409c37d1f5a90adad64719d8
»»»»» Script output:
(Iterable)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing e348b8f21a741015a52fc3a43f32058f12064392
»»»»» Script output:
(Iterable)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 74b755992d7d43e2feb5d82cd270842318507c4c
»»»»» Script output:
(Iterable)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 82b19b1f533fc43531906edf379796e6a4af9493
»»»»» Script output:
(Iterable)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 7c510611343d4f346def02edea740e20bd032d16
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
82b19b1f533fc43531906edf379796e6a4af9493 is the first new commit
commit 82b19b1f533fc43531906edf379796e6a4af9493
Author: Jonathan Worthington <jnthn@jnthn.net>
Date:   Wed Apr 4 13:58:38 2018 +0200

    Use target coercion type in scalar wrap decision
    
    When we compiler a signature with some `T $x`, if T is a type that is
    not `Iterable` then we don't need to wrap it in a `Scalar`. This saves
    quite some allocations. However, we used the nominal type always to
    decide whether to wrap. That's both creating containers when we don't
    need to (for example, `Bool()` doesn't need one but would get one),
    but also potentially a bug if one coerces to an iterable type from a
    non-iterable one (probably odd enough that we didn't hit this issue).

:040000 040000 9016f25e6b2a2bb3208c1275266b88ffab7c5159 3aef985372d6a35aad3bf38c39963e8245aefeda M	src