bisectable6

query

my $l = "start = 94 ; end = 96 ; sum = 55"; if (my ($s, $e, $sum) = $l ~~ m:P5/^start = (\d+) ; end = (\d+) ; sum = (-?\d+)$/.list) {say $sum}

result

Bisecting: 70 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps)
[9d58b5dce76bb32cce564ab17ed75a00c2648dd2] Merge pull request #4701 from MasterDuke17/remove_some_no_longer_needed_CALL-MEs
»»»»» Testing 9d58b5dce76bb32cce564ab17ed75a00c2648dd2
»»»»» Script output:
(Any)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d94e88223fd3b52009184ee4b53551e83aee203a
»»»»» Script output:
(Any)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing fedfd716a0f1ce39331b72fdef270138206eace1
»»»»» Script output:
(Any)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0ab6df2c727622713d5cdca8e7a73f9e1554dd3c
»»»»» Script output:
｢55｣

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 966e77fe10bac8bc725399f06bcb7b5b38e00727
»»»»» Script output:
(Any)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing ed85bad68b0db072902b4ff8a523f9c6860dad96
»»»»» Script output:
(Any)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 6b828fe6159ad948aaac24035233ee697a9f72da
»»»»» Script output:
(Any)

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
｢55｣

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
6b828fe6159ad948aaac24035233ee697a9f72da is the first new commit
commit 6b828fe6159ad948aaac24035233ee697a9f72da
Author: Vadim Belman <vrurg@lflat.org>
Date:   Sat Nov 27 17:28:14 2021 -0500

    Improve handling of junctions on LHS and by given/when
    
    - `when` now uses optimized code unless the topic is a Junction. Falls
      back to `ACCEPTS`+`Bool` in the latter case.
      - smartmatch optimization is now more elaborate about its arguments.
      It
        implicitly `Bool`-ifies `ACCEPTS` return value unless its LHS is a
          regex or negation is to be done.
    
          Overall, with this commit it must not be a problem if `ACCEPTS`
          gets
          autothreaded and results in a junctionized return. Either it will
          be
          collapsed with boolification where smartmatch semantics is
          expected, or
          junctionized outcome of a regex match is expected.

:040000 040000 31b1c3808b2ed26b2aacc97d72df352b08a01fbb 6cca79e7450f6b263b6ca43d2c6ab7148126fbfc M	src