evamvid

fZ[A_WAASUW[AT]@vSWVS^GAq]@B]@SF[]\]\^K}G@P^GWB@[\FAT]@FZWqKP]@US@WB@]FWQFWVE[FZSBSAAE]@VfZSFBSAAE]@V[AV WPTW  PSSSPW
WS
QPPQ

evamvid

• Ardour

evamvid

Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
A Day in the Life# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Fixing a Hole# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Getting Better# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Good Morning, Good Morning# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Lovely Rita# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
She's Leaving Home# Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band

evamvid

{
    "case":"Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission",
    "year": 2010,
    "holding": "Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections. While corporations or unions may not give money directly to campaigns, they may seek to persuade the voting public through other means, including ads, especially where these ads were not broadcast.",
    "judgement": "Reversed",
    "decision": "Corporations cannot be restrict independent expenditures from corporations to campaigns",
    "pros(of overturning restrictions)": {
        "1": "Denying freedom of speech rights to corporations puts at risk other First Amendment protected speech, such as political books published by corporations",
        "2": {
            "argument": "Corporations are an association of individuals (shareholders) with a right to defend their interests",

evamvid

September 27 @ Enloe
October 4 @ Carrboro
October 18 @ Guilford
October 25 @ Millbrook
November 1 @ RCHS
November 8 @ WFU