Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created February 21, 2021 17:54
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Whateverable/f6933451ae3335c692ad72398424c2c2 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Whateverable/f6933451ae3335c692ad72398424c2c2 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
bisectable6
dd Hash.list
Bisecting: 113 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps)
[87d40ab183539730994d69e919649d91c8c2dc88] Merge pull request #1007 from usev6/jvm_core.d.setting
»»»»» Testing 87d40ab183539730994d69e919649d91c8c2dc88
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed. Did you forget a .new?
in block <unit> at /tmp/1VZBpmLbwf line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing aecbd6001728dcb43a966938802d257d9a688dfa
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed. Did you forget a .new?
in block <unit> at /tmp/1VZBpmLbwf line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 8733aa515732ce6319ac52b8a49af4f53d1be2b1
»»»»» Script output:
()
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 54f647d12760c0092b4bfed8812cb6eb6a60b77e
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed. Did you forget a .new?
in block <unit> at /tmp/1VZBpmLbwf line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f6531d366f2f620ad5a79319ea47e66d96860596
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed. Did you forget a .new?
in block <unit> at /tmp/1VZBpmLbwf line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing c13d0a4c065283cbdae635a57417d81f2bb0d0a7
»»»»» Script output:
()
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 6dd542f6de3c61afd60a3241cb605e8e4d62d17a
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed. Did you forget a .new?
in block <unit> at /tmp/1VZBpmLbwf line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 2f69be91446ab3f3ed85c54f741cf701b8cba8d5
»»»»» Script output:
Invocant requires an instance of type Map, but a type object was passed. Did you forget a .new?
in block <unit> at /tmp/1VZBpmLbwf line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
2f69be91446ab3f3ed85c54f741cf701b8cba8d5 is the first new commit
commit 2f69be91446ab3f3ed85c54f741cf701b8cba8d5
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@dijkmat.nl>
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:48:06 2017 +0100
Simplify Map/Hash/TypedHash .pairs / .iterator mess
The base of iterating over an Associative class, should always be
the .iterator method. All other things, such as .pairs, follow
from that.
:040000 040000 365cdcafb0d523709fe34e8625586bd2e413756e 984e4476753be6c340e1d6c7bc4fb4259a2e1a80 M src
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment