Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View heshed's full-sized avatar
:octocat:
happy serving

BadTimo heshed

:octocat:
happy serving
View GitHub Profile
#include <event.h>
#include <evhttp.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <iostream>

Benchmarking Nginx with Go

There are a lot of ways to serve a Go HTTP application. The best choices depend on each use case. Currently nginx looks to be the standard web server for every new project even though there are other great web servers as well. However, how much is the overhead of serving a Go application behind an nginx server? Do we need some nginx features (vhosts, load balancing, cache, etc) or can you serve directly from Go? If you need nginx, what is the fastest connection mechanism? This are the kind of questions I'm intended to answer here. The purpose of this benchmark is not to tell that Go is faster or slower than nginx. That would be stupid.

So, these are the different settings we are going to compare:

  • Go HTTP standalone (as the control group)
  • Nginx proxy to Go HTTP
  • Nginx fastcgi to Go TCP FastCGI
  • Nginx fastcgi to Go Unix Socket FastCGI
@heshed
heshed / 17503-eliminate-rescan.md
Created October 20, 2016 14:48 — forked from aclements/17503-eliminate-rescan.md
Preview of proposal go/golang#17503

Proposal: Eliminate STW stack re-scanning

Author(s): Austin Clements, Rick Hudson

Last updated: 2016-10-18

Discussion at https://golang.org/issue/17503.

Abstract

An Ansible summary

Patterns

  • all (or *)
  • hostname: foo.example.com
  • groupname: webservers
  • or: webservers:dbserver
  • exclude: webserver:!phoenix
  • intersection: webservers:&amp;staging