- The book states (p. 192) that the solution to the problems introduced by algorithmic decision-making should itself be in large part algorithmic.
- The reason being that approaches that rely only on human oversight either entail largely giving up on algorithmic decision-making or will necessarily be outmatched by the scale of the problem and hence be insufficient.
- So the questions becomes:
- How do we keep the human in the loop?
- Could it be a mandatory design requirement of being able to explain by a human to a human to what extent they are in-the-loop (HITL), on-the-loop (HOTL), or in-command (HIC)?
To what extent could algorithmic CONTEXT ANALYSIS help us solving the problem?