Opinions are like assholes, every one has got one.
This one is mine.
Punctuation is a bikeshed. Put your semicolons, whitespace, and commas where you like them.
Locate the section for your github remote in the .git/config
file. It looks like this:
[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = git@github.com:joyent/node.git
Now add the line fetch = +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*
to this section. Obviously, change the github url to match your project's URL. It ends up looking like this:
[color] | |
sh = auto | |
ui = auto | |
pager = true | |
[user] | |
name = User Name | |
email = email@domain.com | |
[alias] | |
lg = log --color --graph --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%cr) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset' --abbrev-commit | |
[core] |
# <type>: (If applied, this commit will...) <subject> (Max 50 char) | |
# |<---- Using a Maximum Of 50 Characters ---->| | |
# Explain why this change is being made | |
# |<---- Try To Limit Each Line to a Maximum Of 72 Characters ---->| | |
# Provide links or keys to any relevant tickets, articles or other resources | |
# Example: Github issue #23 |
A page-rank-like approach to scoring code libraries for quality and dependability. This is a quick-pass attempt at translating metrics we have readily available in the code community into a conversion funnel that might be familiar to marketers.
Conversion funnel equivalent | Metric | Description |
---|---|---|
awareness |
github stars | Equivalent of "likes", but only slightly better than visits (it's possible to have many stars per one visitor). This metric only proves awareness, no causal relationship to actual interest, "real" popularity, code quality, trust, intent to use, or advancement in the conversion funnel. |
interest |
dependents | Dependants are a sign of awareness and commitment from the authors that chose to depend on the library, but no correlation to actual usage, commitment from upstream implementors and users to use the dependent, and is just as likely to represent herd mentality or a reaction to recent awareness as it is to be a p |
Businesses with high strategic control have more sustainable profitability, stronger competitive advantage, and higher valuations. Many business hit multiple strategic control points, and it's possible for businesses to combine multiple control points, even low control, to achieve a much greater level of strategic control in aggregate.
High strategic control:
A hastily-written strawman for how bare imports could be resolved in browsers — see this convo.
This is meant to be used as a bookmarklet, where you click it and it'll apply some basic styling rules to the page you're on.
Primarily, this is designed to be used on those old websites that don't have any styling rules, e.g. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm