This is a courtesy email regarding Bug ID# 13107141.
Engineering has provided a workaround that you can use while we continue working on a resolution of the issue:
In this case, the analyzer does not know that both the loop which initializes the values and the loop that uses them will be executed the same number of times. You can hint to the analyzer that that is the case, by adding the following assert before the second loop:
assert(numbersIndex == numbersCount);
Alternatively, you could use numbersIndex instead if numbersCount in the second loop.