Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@MangaD

MangaD/Compression_utilities.md

Created February 9, 2025 18:19
Show Gist options
  • Save MangaD/6b019f1b13942427d80a63c42681bc7d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save MangaD/6b019f1b13942427d80a63c42681bc7d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Compression utilities
Raw
Compression_utilities.md

Compression utilities

CC0

Disclaimer: ChatGPT generated document.

Compression utilities play a vital role in reducing the size of files and archives, making storage and transfer more efficient. Below is a comprehensive list of popular compression utilities, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, I'll highlight which of these are directly supported by the tar utility and which are not.

1. gzip

Description

gzip (GNU zip) is one of the most widely used compression tools in Unix-like systems. It is primarily used to compress single files and is commonly paired with tar to create compressed archives (e.g., .tar.gz).

Advantages

  • Speed: Fast compression and decompression speeds.
  • Ubiquity: Available by default on most Unix-like systems.
  • Compatibility: Well-supported across various platforms and tools.
  • Simplicity: Easy to use with straightforward command-line options.

Disadvantages

  • Compression Ratio: Lower compression ratio compared to newer algorithms like xz or zstd.
  • Limited Features: Lacks advanced features such as multi-threading.

tar Support

  • Supported: Yes
  • Usage with tar: 
    tar -czvf archive.tar.gz /path/to/directory

2. bzip2

Description

bzip2 is a compression tool that offers higher compression ratios than gzip by using the Burrows-Wheeler algorithm and Huffman coding.

Advantages

  • Higher Compression Ratio: Compresses files more tightly than gzip.
  • Good for Text Files: Particularly effective for compressing text-heavy data.

Disadvantages

  • Speed: Slower compression and decompression compared to gzip.
  • Resource Intensive: Consumes more CPU and memory during compression.

tar Support

  • Supported: Yes
  • Usage with tar: 
    tar -cjvf archive.tar.bz2 /path/to/directory

3. xz

Description

xz utilizes the LZMA2 algorithm to provide high compression ratios. It is designed for compressing single files and is often used with tar to create .tar.xz archives.

Advantages

  • Excellent Compression Ratio: Superior to both gzip and bzip2.
  • Flexible Compression Levels: Allows users to balance between speed and compression ratio.

Disadvantages

  • Compression Speed: Slower than gzip and bzip2, especially at higher compression levels.
  • Resource Usage: Can be memory-intensive during compression.

tar Support

  • Supported: Yes
  • Usage with tar: 
    tar -cJvf archive.tar.xz /path/to/directory

4. lz4

Description

lz4 is a compression algorithm focused on extremely fast compression and decompression speeds, making it ideal for real-time compression scenarios.

Advantages

  • Speed: Significantly faster than most other compression utilities.
  • Low Latency: Suitable for applications requiring rapid compression/decompression.
  • Low Resource Usage: Minimal CPU and memory consumption.

Disadvantages

  • Compression Ratio: Lower than gzip, bzip2, and xz.
  • Limited Adoption: Not as widely supported or integrated as gzip or bzip2.

tar Support

  • Supported: Not directly
  • Workaround: Can be used in combination with tar using piping. 
    tar -cvf - /path/to/directory | lz4 > archive.tar.lz4
    lz4 -d archive.tar.lz4 | tar -xvf -

5. zstd (Zstandard)

Description

Developed by Facebook, zstd is a modern compression algorithm that offers a compelling balance between compression speed and ratio. It supports a wide range of compression levels.

Advantages

  • High Compression Ratio: Comparable to or better than gzip at similar speeds.
  • Fast Speed: Faster compression and decompression than xz at most compression levels.
  • Versatility: Supports features like dictionaries and streaming compression.

Disadvantages

  • Newer Technology: While increasingly popular, it may not be as universally supported as older utilities.
  • Complexity: Additional features can add complexity for users who need only basic compression.

tar Support

  • Supported: Yes (in recent versions)
  • Usage with tar: 
    tar --zstd -cvf archive.tar.zst /path/to/directory
    Note: Ensure your version of tar is compiled with zstd support.

6. compress

Description

compress is one of the original Unix compression tools, utilizing the LZW (Lempel-Ziv-Welch) algorithm. It has largely been superseded by more efficient algorithms.

Advantages

  • Historical Significance: Important in the history of Unix compression tools.
  • Simplicity: Easy to use for basic compression tasks.

Disadvantages

  • Poor Compression Ratio: Less efficient compared to modern compression utilities.
  • Limited Use Cases: Rarely used in contemporary systems.

tar Support

  • Supported: No
  • Alternative Usage: Not commonly paired with tar in modern workflows.

7. brotli

Description

brotli is a compression algorithm developed by Google, primarily optimized for web content compression. It offers high compression ratios and speeds suitable for web assets.

Advantages

  • High Compression Ratio: Especially effective for text-based data like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  • Web Optimization: Widely used in web servers and browsers for content delivery.

Disadvantages

  • Speed: Compression can be slower compared to gzip, though decompression is fast.
  • Limited General-Purpose Use: Primarily designed for web content rather than general file compression.

tar Support

  • Supported: Not directly
  • Workaround: Similar to lz4, requires using piping with tar. 
    tar -cvf - /path/to/directory | brotli > archive.tar.br
    brotli -d archive.tar.br | tar -xvf -

8. lzma

Description

lzma (Lempel-Ziv-Markov chain algorithm) is the algorithm behind the xz compression tool. It offers high compression ratios and is used in various applications, including 7-Zip.

Advantages

  • High Compression Ratio: Comparable to xz.
  • Flexibility: Supports multiple compression levels.

Disadvantages

  • Performance: Similar to xz in terms of speed and resource usage.
  • Complexity: Less straightforward for users compared to gzip.

tar Support

  • Supported: Indirectly via xz (-J flag) as they share the same underlying algorithm.
  • Usage with tar: 
    tar -cJvf archive.tar.xz /path/to/directory

9. lzop

Description

lzop is a compression tool similar to gzip but focused on speed rather than compression ratio. It uses the LZO (Lempel-Ziv-Oberhumer) algorithm.

Advantages

  • Very Fast: Extremely quick compression and decompression.
  • Low Resource Usage: Minimal CPU and memory requirements.
  • Suitable for Real-Time Applications: Ideal where speed is critical.

Disadvantages

  • Low Compression Ratio: Offers less compression compared to gzip, bzip2, or xz.
  • Limited Adoption: Not as commonly used or supported as other utilities.

tar Support

  • Supported: Not directly
  • Workaround: Can be used with tar through piping. 
    tar -cvf - /path/to/directory | lzop > archive.tar.lzo
    lzop -d archive.tar.lzo | tar -xvf -

10. 7z (7-Zip)

Description

7z is a high-compression archive format and the name of the program that handles it. It supports various compression algorithms, with LZMA and LZMA2 being the most prominent.

Advantages

  • Superior Compression: Often achieves better compression ratios than gzip, bzip2, and xz.
  • Versatility: Supports multiple compression algorithms and formats.
  • Encryption: Provides strong encryption options for archives.

Disadvantages

  • Speed: Compression and decompression can be slower compared to gzip and lz4.
  • Compatibility: Not as universally supported in Unix-like systems as gzip or bzip2.
  • Complexity: More options and features can make it more complex to use.

tar Support

  • Supported: No
  • Alternative Usage: Typically used independently of tar. However, you can combine them manually: 
    tar -cvf - /path/to/directory | 7z a -si archive.7z
    7z x archive.7z -so | tar -xvf -

Summary of tar Support

Compression Utility Direct tar Support Notes
gzip Yes (-z flag) Commonly used with tar.
bzip2 Yes (-j flag) Widely supported.
xz Yes (-J flag) Requires recent tar versions.
zstd Yes (--zstd flag) Supported in newer tar versions.
lz4 No Use piping as a workaround.
brotli No Use piping as a workaround.
compress No Largely obsolete and not commonly used.
lzma Indirectly via xz Use -J flag with tar.
lzop No Use piping as a workaround.
7z No Use piping or separate tools.

Choosing the Right Compression Utility

When selecting a compression utility to use with tar, consider the following factors:

  1. Compression Ratio: If minimizing archive size is crucial, xz or zstd may be preferable.
  2. Speed: For faster compression and decompression, gzip or lz4 are suitable choices.
  3. Compatibility: gzip and bzip2 are the most universally supported, making them safe choices for broader compatibility.
  4. Resource Usage: If working in environments with limited CPU or memory, lightweight options like lz4 or lzop are beneficial.
  5. Specific Use Cases: For web-related tasks, brotli might be advantageous, while 7z is excellent for scenarios requiring high compression and encryption.

Practical Examples

Creating Archives with Different Compression Utilities

  • Using gzip:

    tar -czvf archive.tar.gz /path/to/directory

  • Using bzip2:

    tar -cjvf archive.tar.bz2 /path/to/directory

  • Using xz:

    tar -cJvf archive.tar.xz /path/to/directory

  • Using zstd:

    tar --zstd -cvf archive.tar.zst /path/to/directory

Extracting Archives with Different Compression Utilities

  • Extracting gzip Archive:

    tar -xzvf archive.tar.gz

  • Extracting bzip2 Archive:

    tar -xjvf archive.tar.bz2

  • Extracting xz Archive:

    tar -xJvf archive.tar.xz

  • Extracting zstd Archive:

    tar --zstd -xvf archive.tar.zst

Conclusion

Selecting the appropriate compression utility depends on your specific needs regarding speed, compression ratio, and compatibility. While gzip, bzip2, and xz are directly supported by tar and are excellent all-around choices, newer utilities like zstd offer a compelling balance between speed and compression efficiency. For specialized use cases, tools like lz4 and brotli provide distinct advantages. Always consider the trade-offs between compression ratio and speed to choose the best tool for your task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment