MailChimp integration

gistfile1.txt

	<?php
/*///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Part of the code from the book 
Building Findable Websites: Web Standards, SEO, and Beyond
by Aarron Walter (aarron@buildingfindablewebsites.com)
http://buildingfindablewebsites.com

Distrbuted under Creative Commons license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////*/


function storeAddress(){
	
	// Validation
	if(!$_GET['email']){ return "No email address provided"; } 

	if(!preg_match("/^[_a-z0-9-]+(\.[_a-z0-9-]+)*@[a-z0-9-]+(\.[a-z0-9-]+)*$/i", $_GET['email'])) {
		return "Email address is invalid"; 
	}

	require_once('MCAPI.class.php');
	// grab an API Key from http://admin.mailchimp.com/account/api/
	$api = new MCAPI('dd1af3a9705e8c60f6ab86ce0918d7b7-us1');
	
	// grab your List's Unique Id by going to http://admin.mailchimp.com/lists/
	// Click the "settings" link for the list - the Unique Id is at the bottom of that page. 
	$list_id = "b590c7d525";

	if($api->listSubscribe($list_id, $_GET['email'], '') === true) {
		// It worked!	
		return 'Woohoo! You\'re now keeping current with happenings at Greenview';
	} else { 
		// An error ocurred, return error message	
		return 'Error: ' . $api->errorMessage;
	}
	
}

// If being called via ajax, autorun the function
if($_GET['ajax']){ echo storeAddress(); }
?>

Your template is including the file which is looking for a GET index of 'ajax' immediately. Using the isset() method clears away the error and allows it to still work when your ajax call occurs (assuming your javascript using that as a GET key). isset() is one of a few options that could be used here.

The form needs to include an ajax field to trigger the call to the storeAddress method:

<form>
    <input id="ajax" name="ajax" type="hidden" value="y" />
</form>

Stephen, it looks like he already has ajax being passed via jQuery in his functions.js file. Would the form field still be required for non ajax calls?

Previous comment deleted after confusing myself for 5 minutes...

You're right, Erik. functions.js does add the ajax parameter (I hadn't seen that file).

In that case, the submit field needs to be given a name, so the test in [the form gist]:https://gist.github.com/1589144 will work. That should all work then, will a non-AJAX fallback (I think). The way this is organised could be a lot clearer though.