$ php in_array_vs_isset_vs_array_key_exists.php
Function call in_array took 1.51871 seconds
Function call isset took 0.14684 seconds
Function call array_key_exists took 0.22123 seconds
Forked from alcaeus/in_array_vs_isset_vs_array_key_exists.php
Created
January 27, 2020 09:41
-
-
Save Advanc8d/cea821b74fe4fba8ee5f16d51195b39a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Performance comparision: in-array vs. isset vs. array_key_exists
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
<?php declare(strict_types = 1); | |
function testPerformance($name, Closure $closure, $runs = 1000000) | |
{ | |
$start = microtime(true); | |
for (; $runs > 0; $runs--) | |
{ | |
$closure(); | |
} | |
$end = microtime(true); | |
printf("Function call %s took %.5f seconds\n", $name, $end - $start); | |
} | |
$items = [1111111]; | |
for ($i = 0; $i < 100000; $i++) { | |
$items[] = rand(0, 1000000); | |
} | |
$items = array_unique($items); | |
shuffle($items); | |
$assocItems = array_combine($items, array_fill(0, count($items), true)); | |
$in_array = function () use ($items) { | |
in_array(1111111, $items); | |
}; | |
$isset = function () use ($assocItems) { | |
isset($items[1111111]); | |
}; | |
$array_key_exists = function () use ($assocItems) { | |
array_key_exists(1111111, $assocItems); | |
}; | |
testPerformance('in_array', $in_array, 100000); | |
testPerformance('isset', $isset, 100000); | |
testPerformance('array_key_exists', $array_key_exists, 100000); |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment