AgoristRadio

<BenderCoin> I was wondering if anyone knew if 'change' addresses are reused to receive change? or are new change addresses\
 created when they are needed. I could not find anything on this with some searching.
<BenderCoin> The reason this is important is if someone uses a wallet to send btc to a mix service, then sends it back to t\
he same wallet, then spends it, if the new spend can use an old change address, then the mix service 'clean coins' have now\
 been linked with this old change address.
<gmaxwell> BenderCoin: they are not reused.
<Mylon> Someone with more knowledge of the code will need to confirm / elaborate on this, but from what I understood, is th\
at they by default always generate new addresses
<Mylon> Though ofc this is wallet specific
<BenderCoin> gmaxwell, so your response was in regards to bitcoin-qt then.

AgoristRadio

#!/usr/bin/env sh

# bitdump.sh
#
# captures Bitcoin network traffic

SELF=`basename $0`

if [[ $1 = "" ]]; then
  DEFAULT="en1"

AgoristRadio

require 'rubygems'
require 'blather/client'
require 'awesome_print'
require 'nokogiri'
require 'pretty-xml'
require 'nokogiri-pretty'
include PrettyXML

# This is a Blather bot that receives file transfers that are sent using
# XEP 0096, using either p2p SOCKS5 (XEP 0065), or through the server

AgoristRadio

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# encoding: utf-8

require "rubygems"
require "amqp"
require "cinch"

class RailsMonitor
  def initialize(bot)
    @bot = bot

AgoristRadio

<FellowTraveler> okay amiller, et al, I believe I have finished writing up my thoughts / arguments on the auditing.
<FellowTraveler> There's an outline at the top, a list of scenarios, and a summary at the bottom.
<FellowTraveler> https://github.com/FellowTraveler/Open-Transactions/wiki/Auditing
<FellowTraveler> Basically I believe that amiller's requirement that third parties also have incentive to audit the transaction server, happens to be met in the case of Bitcoin, when OT is used in the scenario of voting groups.
<FellowTraveler> I believe that "kills two birds with one stone" and the rest of the article is a comparison of the various scenarios and their different incentives and vulnerabilities.
<FellowTraveler> I believe that without voting groups, there will not be any conventional Bitcoin issuers, since there is no value for them to offer in the realm of pure storage.
<FellowTraveler> Therefore I believe there will only be Bitcoin issuers who operate their own transaction server (such as knotwork) wh

AgoristRadio

(05:39:54 PM) fellowtraveler: what's the price up to today ?
(05:40:04 PM) fellowtraveler: holy fuck $71!

AgoristRadio

Bitcoin OTC Gribble Examples

• Place an Order to Sell 30 BTC at a dynamic price of whatever the last MTGox Price was in Person in Los Angeles Area:

<MyNick> ;;sell 30 btc at "{mtgoxlast}" USD in person local to Los Angeles/San Fernando Valley
<gribble> Order id 14160 created.

• Get the cross Price of Gold and Bitcoin

AgoristRadio

# Instapaper

javascript:function%20iprl5(){var%20d=document,z=d.createElement('scr'+'ipt'),b=d.body,l=d.location;try{if(!b)throw(0);d.title='(Saving...)%20'+d.title;z.setAttribute('src',l.protocol+'//www.instapaper.com/j/L26o1hPEPERe?u='+encodeURIComponent(l.href)+'&t='+(new%20Date().getTime()));b.appendChild(z);}catch(e){alert('Please%20wait%20until%20the%20page%20has%20loaded.');}}iprl5();void(0)

javascript:function
%
20
iprl5()
{
    var %

AgoristRadio

# http://www.travisberry.com/2011/05/create-github-gist-with-ruby/ 
  require 'net/http'
  require 'uri'
  require 'json'
  
  def get_gist(fileName,content)
    res = Net::HTTP.post_form(URI.parse('http://gist.github.com/api/v1/json/new'),
      { 'files[#{fileName}]' => content,
        'login' => 'USER NAME HERE',
        'token' => 'API TOKEN HERE',

AgoristRadio

<FellowTraveler> Hmm
<FellowTraveler> "intermediaries in the transfer of virtual currencies from one person to another person, or to another location, are money transmitters that must register with FinCEN as MSBs unless an exception applies."
<FellowTraveler> Is an OT server actually an intermediary?  I don't think it is!
<FellowTraveler> an OT server is a notary.
<FellowTraveler> the transaction is between two people — the OT server countersigns it.
<FellowTraveler> the OT server never takes possession of any of the actual money.
<FellowTraveler> is a notary an intermediary ?
<FellowTraveler> basically the OT server "signs as a witness"
<FellowTraveler> it does not sign as a party.
<FellowTraveler> and it does not take any money in or out — the issuers do that.