Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ArtOfCode-
Last active February 22, 2017 16:17
Show Gist options
  • Save ArtOfCode-/240e8b01dff9d210a830b2afd51232a6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ArtOfCode-/240e8b01dff9d210a830b2afd51232a6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Meta post

Spam on $SiteName is being automatically flagged: please tell us what you think

Over the past three years, I, along with a team of other people have created an application called SmokeDetector. Some of you may have heard of it. For those who have not, here's a 30-second run-down.

SmokeDetector scans all new and updated content, network-wide, trying to find spam. Over time, it's become very accurate at doing this, and has a team of people continuously improving it.

At the start of this year, we began setting up a project to make use of SmokeDetector's accuracy to flag spam automatically. Full details of how this works are available in this post on Meta.SE, but again, a brief version: we select combinations of patterns that have a history of being accurate, and check them against a database to make sure they're at least 99.5% accurate. Once those combinations are satisfied, we cast up to 3 spam flags on the post automatically.

We believe we've designed this system to be both accurate and safe, but now we'd like your input on it. If you have any comments, questions, concerns, or objections to this system, please post them as an answer either here, or on the Meta.SE post, and we'll do our best to answer them.

@ArtOfCode-
Copy link
Author

Note

  • I fully expect there to be problems with this. Find them, let's get rid of them. This needs to be as good as possible before we post it.
  • Let's not have arguments here in the comments. Unless there's a systemic issue with someone's comments, let's just assume they're valid. Remember that people with all points of view exist on meta sites.

@AWegnerGitHub
Copy link

  • we cast up to 3 flags -> we cast up to 3 spam flags. It should also be noted that this needs to be changed on a few sites that have a lower value.

@rschrieken
Copy link

rschrieken commented Feb 22, 2017

  • I would remove the last sentence but move that nuclear option in the list prior to that sentence:

    If you have any comments, questions, concerns or objections, please post them as an answer either here, or on the Meta.SE post, and I'll do my best to address them.

  • You start with I ... have created. Later on you switch to we. Can you maintain the style where you use I instead of we.

  • In case no one even knows what spam flags are, link to an FAQ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment