asukakenji

Go (Golang) Standard Library Interfaces (Selected)

This is not an exhaustive list of all interfaces in Go's standard library. I only list those I think are important. Interfaces defined in frequently used packages (like io, fmt) are included. Interfaces that have significant importance are also included.

All of the following information is based on go version go1.8.3 darwin/amd64.

Reza-Rg

#!/usr/bin/env bash

if [ "$(uname)" = "Darwin" ]; then

jq=/usr/local/bin/jq
wget=/usr/local/bin/wget

image_folder_path="/Users/$USER/Documents/Images/Bing/"
mkdir -p $image_folder_path

fredbenenson

layout	title	description	tags
default	SQL Style Guide	A guide to writing clean, clear, and consistent SQL.	data process

Purpose

kt0

For persian_date add jalalidate to your gemfiles, then add this to ApplicationHelper as helper (or any other place you want to use).

Default date format here is like (یک‌شنبه ۲۹ دی ۱۳۹۲ - ۰۳:۱۰) for more format options see.

unpack Snippet from a question in stackoverflow

module ApplicationHelper
  def persian_numbers(str)
 str ? str.unpack('U*').map{ |e| (0..9).to_a.include?(e-48) ? e + 1728 : e }.pack('U*') : ''

denji

Moved to git-repository: https://github.com/denji/awesome-http-benchmark

Tools

Located in alphabetical order (not prefer)

• ab – slow and single threaded, written in C
• apib – most of the features of ApacheBench (ab), also designed as a more modern replacement, written in C
• autocannon – fast HTTP/1.1 benchmarking tool written in Node.js
• baloo – Expressive end-to-end HTTP API testing made easy, written in Go (golang)

jeremiahsnapp

HTTP(S) specific MITM SSL Proxies

mitmproxy

mitmproxy is an excellent console app written in Python.

It is easy to use on Linux and OS X.

Use brew install mitmproxy to install it on OS X.

chitchcock

Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.

I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real