Created
August 9, 2017 22:18
-
-
Save CameronCarroll/4129779d221bc20078b1bb68a1e80702 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
== Design == | |
* Compiled possible solutions for tradeoff analysis, building group knowledge of sensors and microcontrollers. | |
* Uncovering unknown components to the problem forced late redesign in system architecture. (Naive solution --> CPLD central control --> PCB control board) | |
* Design settled on a central PCB containing controls circuits, connected directly to vehicle sensors and switches. | |
* Some unexpected or misunderstood issues: Latching/reset button circuits, precharge/discharge circuits, galvanic isolation between HV and LV, safety interlocks | |
* Flowcharting/pseudocode for microcontroller and data-acquisition procedures before receiving devices | |
== Analysis == | |
* Tradeoff analysis with decision matrices to select the many sensors, buttons, cables and connectors. | |
* RC-circuit discharge-time versus power-dissipation (for precharge/discharging of controller capacitors) | |
* Voltage drop and ampacity calculations for cable selection | |
* Fusing: Melt times and I2t ratings | |
* Failure analysis: Cause, effect, detection & handling. | |
== Manufacturing == | |
* PCB sent out for printing, then individual components soldered on | |
* Small discrete circuits soldered onto stripboard, cut down to size and secured to/insulated from mounting points using stick-on velcro | |
* Wiring vehicle at competition doesn't allow for smart routing or looming. | |
* Panels cut from quartz fiber panel (dash) and acrylic (side switch panel) -- Min/max thickness is important for panel mount devices... | |
== Mystery Section == |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment