DavidArno

public class C 
{
    RedisValue ToRedisValue(object obj)
    {
        return obj switch
        {
            null => Null,
            RedisValue v => v,
            string v => (RedisValue)v,
            int v => v,

DavidArno

IEnumerable<string> GenerateFizzBuzzList()
{
    var fizzes = Cycle("", "", "Fizz");
    var buzzes = Cycle("", "", "", "", "Buzz");
    var words = fizzes.Zip(buzzes, (f, b) => f + b);
    var numbers = Range(1, 100);
    return numbers.Zip(words, (n, w) => w == "" ? n.ToString() : w);
}

DavidArno

using System;

namespace FizzBuzz
{
    static class Program    
    {
        static void Main()
        {
            for (var i = 1; i <= 100; i++)
            {

DavidArno

public Bar DoSomething(Foo uncheckedFoo) => 
    uncheckedFoo is Foo foo 
        ? DoSomething2(foo) 
        : throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(uncheckedFoo));

private Bar DoSomething2(Foo foo) => // foo is definitely set here

DavidArno

public void F<T>()
{
    switch (typeof(T))
    {
        case Type t when t == typeof(Foo): break;
        case Type t when t == typeof(Bar): break;
    }
}

DavidArno

if condition_1:
    statement_1()
else if condition_2:
    statement_2()
else if condition_3:
    statement_3()
else:
    statement_9()

DavidArno

<div class="comment">
	<div class="comment-author">David Arno</div>
	<div class="comment-content">
		In your summary, you state "The main disadvantage of using the internal access modifier is that you can't easily unit test such a class".
		Your entire post builds a complex, messy workaround to this through marking active methods as obsolete and having to wrap tests in "ignore warning"
		pragmas. Yet the whole article misses the elephant in the room: internal classes are implementation details; they should not be unit tested directly. 
		Implementation details change, leading to brittle tests that need rewriting as those details change. Unit tests should test public APIs. If internal code 
		cannot be reached via a public API, then delete it as it has no purpose.
	</div>
	<div class="comment-date">2015-08-22 12:15 UTC</div>

DavidArno

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
using System.Xml;
using System.Xml.Linq;

namespace GithubWikiDoc
{

DavidArno

public class Cat
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Color { get; set; }

    public Cat()
    {
        Cat("Unamed", "gray");
    }

DavidArno

DoSomethingCodeA();
try
{
    var exceptionsToBeIgnored = false;
    foreach (var x in SomeExpression) 
    {
        exceptionsToBeIgnored = true;
        DoSomethingCodeB();
        exceptionsToBeIgnored = false;
    }