Short example of something I'm a bit confused about in the current implementation of Asynquence's map() implementation.

gistfile1.js

var ASQ = require('asynquence');
require('asynquence-contrib');

var returnsArr = function returnsArr(c) { c && c([1]); return [1]};

ASQ().map(returnsArr(), function (v, c) { c(v + 1) }); // fine

ASQ().then(returnsArr).map(function (v, c) { c(v + 1) }); // doesn't work

You could also do:

ASQ()
.val(function(){
   return [1,2,3]; // inject a value-message into the stream
})
.seq(function(arr){
   return ASQ()
   .map(arr, function (v, c) { c(v + 1) });
})
.val(function(newArr){
   console.log(newArr); // 2,3,4
});

And of course, if that was a common use-case for you, it'd be pretty trivial to make that usage of the API into a simple plugin. Almost any usage of the ASQ API can be rolled into a plugin.

After thinking it over, I decided to update map(..) itself to handle this use-case. Was a simple addition and there was no need for a separate plugin.

Thanks for the idea! :)