Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@EricWF EricWF/constinit.md
Last active Jul 18, 2019

Embed
What would you like to do?
A Proposal to add [[constinit]] to C++
Document Number: P1143r3
Date: 2019-06-18
Project: Programming Language C++, Evolution
Revises: P1143r2
Reply to: eric@efcs.ca

Adding the constinit keyword

const char *g() { return "dynamic initialization"; }
constexpr const char *f(bool p) { return p ? "constant initializer" : g(); }
 
constinit const char *c = f(true); // OK.
constinit const char *d = f(false); // ill-formed

Introduction

We're all familar with the Static Initialization Order Fiasco. Static storage duration variables with dynamic initializers cause hard-to-find bugs caused by the indeterminate order of dynamic initialization.

However, static variables with constant initializers avoid these pitfalls by causing the initialization to take place at compile time. These variables can be safely used during dynamic initialization across translation units.

Unfortunatly the rules for constant initialization are complex and change dialect to dialect. This makes it non-obvious what form of initialization is taking place simply by inspecting the code. We need a way to enforce that constant initialization is truely taking place. It’s important to be able to fail fast instead of silently falling back on dynamic initialization.

This paper proposes the constinit keyword.

The keyword can be applied to variable declarations with static storage duration. It requires that the variable have a "constant initializer". For example:

// Compiled as C++14
struct T {
  constexpr T(int) {}
  ~T(); // non-trivial
};
constinit T x = {42}; // Initialization OK. Doesn't check destructor.
constinit T y = 42; // error: variable does not have a constant initializer
// copy initialization is not a constant expression on a non-literal type in C++14.

Open Questions

Applying constinit to declarations or just definitions?

constinit communicates the intention of the programmer to both the compiler and other programmers. In order for the compiler to inforce the intent, the declaration need only be present on the definition, and not any previous declarations. However, to express the intent to other programmers there is value in allowing the constinit specifier to appear on non-defining declarations. For example:

// Foo.h
struct Foo {
  constinit static int x;
};
// Foo.cpp
int Foo::x = 42; 

However, there is another case where a variable declaration is not a definition, and that's when extern is specified. In this case the extern variable declaration may not be available to the compiler when checking the definition, and so it has no way of knowing that it was, at one point, declared with constinit. This causes the keyword to be silently ignored.

For these reasons this proposal disallows constinit from being mixed with extern unless the declaration is a definition. For example:

constinit extern int x = 42; // OK
constinit extern int y; // ill-formed.

This issue also affects redundant redeclarations of constexpr static data members. For example:

struct Foo {
  static constexpr int x = 42;
};
constinit constexpr int Foo::x; // OK?

In the above case, the addition of constinit to a constexpr variable is meaningless. Additionally, allowing a redeclaration to add constinit after the variable is defined would be problematic (though in this particular case constexpr makes it moot).

Previous Discussions

constinit as an attribute.

in r0 of this paper constinit was proposed as an attribute. When this idea was presented, there was general concencious that this feature would be better suited as a keyword. First, constinit enforces correctness and if compilers were allowed to ignore it as they can attributes, it would allow "ill-formed" programs to compile. Second, there was some discussion about the behavior of [[constinit]] being out-of-scope for attributes (I don't believe this to be the case).

Wording

Modify [dcl.spec] as described below.

9.1 Specifiers [dcl.spec]

  1. The specifiers that can be used in a declaration are:
      decl-specifier:
         ...
         constinit
    

2.Each decl-specifier shall appear at most once in a complete decl-specifier-seq, except that long may appear twice. The constexpr and consteval decl-specifiers shall not both appear in a decl-specifier-seq.At most one of the constexpr, consteval, and constinit keywords shall appear in a decl-specifier-seq.

9.1.X The constinit specifier [dcl.constinit]

Add the new subclause under [dcl.spec] with the following wording.

  1. The constinit specifier shall be applied only to declaration of a variable with static or thread storage duration.
  2. The constinit specifier shall be applied only to the definition of a variable with static or thread storage duration, or to the declaration of a static data member in a class definition.
  3. If a variable declared with the constinit specifier has dynamic initialization ([basic.start.dynamic]), the program is ill-formed. [Note: Otherwise the variable is fully initialized during static initialization using either constant initialization or zero initialization --- end note]
  4. [Example:
    const char *g() { return "dynamic initialization"; }
    constexpr const char *f(bool p) { return p ? "constant initializer" : g(); }
    
    constinit const char *c = f(true); // OK.
    constinit const char *d = f(false); // ill-formed
    --- end example]

References

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.