Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Huge
Created November 25, 2019 16:27
Show Gist options
  • Save Huge/bfad27e8871504898c2111dedf940386 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Huge/bfad27e8871504898c2111dedf940386 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Another major area of ethical consumerism is “green living.” On a per-person
basis, US citizens emit more greenhouse gasses than any other large country,
with the average American adult every year producing twenty-one metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent. (Remember that carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2eq
,
is a way of measuring your carbon footprint that includes greenhouse gasses
other than carbon dioxide, like methane and nitrous oxide.) As we’ve seen,
climate change is a big deal. It’s therefore natural to want to do something about
it, and the obvious way is to move to a lower-carbon lifestyle.
Sadly, many popular ways of reducing your greenhouse gas emissions are
rather ineffective. One common recommendation is to turn off or shut down
electronic devices when you’re not using them, rather than keeping them on
standby. However, this achieves very little compared to other things you could
do: one hot bath adds more to your carbon footprint than leaving your phone
charger plugged in for a whole year; even leaving on your TV (one of the worst
offenders in terms of standby energy use) for a whole year contributes less to
your carbon footprint than driving a car for just two hours. Another common
recommendation is to turn off lights when you leave a room, but lighting
accounts for only 3 percent of household energy use, so even if you never used
lighting in your house, you would save only a fraction of a metric ton of carbon
emissions. Plastic bags have also been a major focus of concern, but even on
very generous estimates, if you stopped using plastic bags entirely, you’d cut out
one hundred kilograms CO2 equivalent per year, which is only 0.4 percent of
your total emissions. Similarly, the focus on buying locally produced goods is
overhyped: only 10 percent of the carbon footprint of food comes from
transportation, whereas 80 percent comes from production, so what type of food
you buy is much more important than whether that food is produced locally or
internationally. Cutting out red meat and dairy for one day a week achieves a
greater reduction in your carbon footprint than buying entirely locally based
food. In fact, exactly the same food can sometimes have a higher carbon
footprint if it’s locally grown than if it’s imported: one study found that the
carbon footprint from locally grown tomatoes in northern Europe was five times
as great as the carbon footprint from tomatoes grown in Spain, because the
emissions generated by heating and lighting greenhouses dwarfed the emissions
generated by transportation.
The most effective ways to cut down your emissions are to reduce your
intake of meat (especially beef, which can cut out about a metric ton of CO2eq per
year), to reduce the amount you travel (driving half as much would cut out two
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment