Created
November 25, 2019 16:27
-
-
Save Huge/bfad27e8871504898c2111dedf940386 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Another major area of ethical consumerism is “green living.” On a per-person | |
basis, US citizens emit more greenhouse gasses than any other large country, | |
with the average American adult every year producing twenty-one metric tons of | |
carbon dioxide equivalent. (Remember that carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2eq | |
, | |
is a way of measuring your carbon footprint that includes greenhouse gasses | |
other than carbon dioxide, like methane and nitrous oxide.) As we’ve seen, | |
climate change is a big deal. It’s therefore natural to want to do something about | |
it, and the obvious way is to move to a lower-carbon lifestyle. | |
Sadly, many popular ways of reducing your greenhouse gas emissions are | |
rather ineffective. One common recommendation is to turn off or shut down | |
electronic devices when you’re not using them, rather than keeping them on | |
standby. However, this achieves very little compared to other things you could | |
do: one hot bath adds more to your carbon footprint than leaving your phone | |
charger plugged in for a whole year; even leaving on your TV (one of the worst | |
offenders in terms of standby energy use) for a whole year contributes less to | |
your carbon footprint than driving a car for just two hours. Another common | |
recommendation is to turn off lights when you leave a room, but lighting | |
accounts for only 3 percent of household energy use, so even if you never used | |
lighting in your house, you would save only a fraction of a metric ton of carbon | |
emissions. Plastic bags have also been a major focus of concern, but even on | |
very generous estimates, if you stopped using plastic bags entirely, you’d cut out | |
one hundred kilograms CO2 equivalent per year, which is only 0.4 percent of | |
your total emissions. Similarly, the focus on buying locally produced goods is | |
overhyped: only 10 percent of the carbon footprint of food comes from | |
transportation, whereas 80 percent comes from production, so what type of food | |
you buy is much more important than whether that food is produced locally or | |
internationally. Cutting out red meat and dairy for one day a week achieves a | |
greater reduction in your carbon footprint than buying entirely locally based | |
food. In fact, exactly the same food can sometimes have a higher carbon | |
footprint if it’s locally grown than if it’s imported: one study found that the | |
carbon footprint from locally grown tomatoes in northern Europe was five times | |
as great as the carbon footprint from tomatoes grown in Spain, because the | |
emissions generated by heating and lighting greenhouses dwarfed the emissions | |
generated by transportation. | |
The most effective ways to cut down your emissions are to reduce your | |
intake of meat (especially beef, which can cut out about a metric ton of CO2eq per | |
year), to reduce the amount you travel (driving half as much would cut out two |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment