You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
. Testing SamH syncs to GitHub.Gist via StackEdit.
.. indicators within StackEdit suggested the sync took place automatically.
... there us also an explicit control that can trigger the sync.
Now to see if I can edit on SysH and re-sync to GitHub.
...thisPC
It is possible this file is synced to two locations.
Link to this update via a separate browser session.
It's now time to focus on content, even if only for this Gist.
Create and test a second Gist page that cited be a content cascade.
2019.01.20:
Caution is called for until workflow is fully tested. At least make sure that backups of the content are available. This is less important if I only edit the SamTalH version for the moment.
2019.01.26.update to confirm Sync methodologies.
A second location appears to have been created. This seems to be due to setting different View permissions, since both the Public and Private versions now exist.
when multiple copies of a gist exist due to StackEdit synch settings, the multiples seem to be displayed near the end of the allGists list
6. CONCLUSIONS
It is time to establish a StackEditH workflow.
a fully qualified location might help ... StatusFile
done
Started reducing this Public, Published Gist.
...
Obviously this note is syncing.
Considered the two sync symbols apparent in the StackEdit view.
Deleted the 2nd sync.
I can edit on SamTabH and sync to GitHub.
For the moment, just edit in this manner to avoid concerns about downloading from GitHub.
Search for exotic Characters is effective.
Search seens to work better than limited Tags.
...
Made some progress apparently, but still having issues. This edit is via StackEdit. Interestingly, this does work!
Note that there are at least 2 options, one for GitHub and one for Gist.
7. Recommendations
7.0
7.1 review Contents
8. Appendices
Tests to determine if these footnote references be separated, showed that they are not rendered that way.
...