A LINQ/Tuple<> solution to FizzBuzz

FizzBuzz.cs

void DoFizzBuzz()
    {
        var combinations = new List<Tuple<int, string>>
        { 
            new Tuple<int, string> (3, "Fizz"), 
            new Tuple<int, string> (5, "Buzz"), 
        };

        Func<int, int, bool> isMatch = (i, comb) => i % comb == 0;
        
	for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++)
        {
            var matchingCombs = combinations.Where(c => isMatch(i, c.Item1)).ToList();
            Console.WriteLine(matchingCombs.Any() ? string.Join("", matchingCombs.Select(c => c.Item2)) : i.ToString());
        }
    }

I looked at writing the following code with the KeyValuePair; however when I bench marked the performance of the KVP against the Tuple. The comparison is relevant only in cases where a Tuple of two items is used. Tuples passed as part of functions (especially Linq/Lambda functions) perform better than KeyValuePairs.

The main advantage that I need to point out is that A tuple can return multiple values (with less code than a class would require). But using the c.Item1, c.Item2, c.Item3 syntax may seem a little funky.