Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Laeeth
Last active April 5, 2023 03:30
Show Gist options
  • Star 1 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Laeeth/53dba236b0f3c039d5f8fc80d751cdfb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Laeeth/53dba236b0f3c039d5f8fc80d751cdfb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Can Large Language Models do Abduction? Chat GPT answers

Are LLMs able to do abductive reasoning?

Yes, LLMs (Large Language Models) such as GPT-3 have demonstrated the ability to perform abductive reasoning to a certain extent. Abductive reasoning involves making an inference based on the best available explanation of observed phenomena or data.

LLMs achieve this by analyzing large amounts of data and generating probabilistic predictions based on patterns and relationships found in the data. In the context of natural language processing, this can involve generating hypotheses about the meaning of a sentence or paragraph based on the surrounding context.

However, it's important to note that LLMs are not perfect and their abductive reasoning abilities are not always reliable. They may make incorrect inferences or struggle with more complex reasoning tasks. Additionally, their reasoning abilities may be limited by the quality and diversity of the data they are trained on.

Can LLMs reason like Sherlock Holmes in The Dog That Did Not Bark in the Night?

The short answer is no, LLMs cannot reason exactly like Sherlock Holmes in "The Adventure of the Dog That Did Not Bark in the Night-Time," at least not yet.

In that story, Sherlock Holmes used abductive reasoning to solve a mystery by noticing something that did not happen (i.e., the dog did not bark) and using that observation to infer that the intruder was known to the dog. This involved making a logical leap and inferring a conclusion based on the absence of evidence, which is a difficult task for current AI systems.

While LLMs are able to perform some level of abductive reasoning, they are limited by their reliance on statistical patterns in data, rather than true understanding and reasoning. They do not have the ability to make logical leaps or creative inferences like humans do, nor do they possess the same level of intuition, creativity, or common sense that human beings have.

In summary, while LLMs have impressive language capabilities and are constantly improving, they are not yet capable of replicating the full range of reasoning and problem-solving abilities exhibited by humans, including the type of abductive reasoning used by Sherlock Holmes in "The Dog That Did Not Bark in the Night-Time."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment