Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@MarcoWorms
Last active August 7, 2023 19:06
Show Gist options
  • Star 73 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 6 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save MarcoWorms/30758235f05faec844b8c06ce2e5bac9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save MarcoWorms/30758235f05faec844b8c06ce2e5bac9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Redux in a nutshell
function createStore (reducers) {
var state = reducers()
const store = {
dispatch: (action) => {
state = reducers(state, action)
},
getState: () => {
return state
}
}
return store
}
const reducers = (state = { counter: 0 }, action) => {
if (!action) { return state }
switch (action.type) {
case 'INCREMENT':
return { counter: state.counter + 1 }
case 'DECREMENT':
return { counter: state.counter - 1 }
default:
return state
}
}
const store = createStore(reducers)
store.getState() // => { counter: 0 }
store.dispatch({ type: 'INCREMENT' })
store.getState() // => { counter: 1 }
@MarcoWorms
Copy link
Author

MarcoWorms commented Nov 13, 2020

Just saw this got some traction, thanks for the nice comments!

@achshar hey there, in my opinion there are different ways to achieve the same goals when dealing tools like JS, you could totally achieve the same behavior by using classes. Using the redux-style solution means that the developer is prioritizing predictability in state management, I wouldn't say that this example is "how state should be done for any application", it's more like "here's the barebones of redux philosophy without having to care about importing libs"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment