-
-
Save Mzyxptlk/cbd49a8d0c3896bd5b5f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Butcher / mz
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Session Start: Sat Dec 06 10:57:29 2014 | |
Session Ident: B-Butch3r | |
2014-12-06 10:57:29 Session Ident: B-Butch3r (Netgamers) (~mrknutsen@slktr.users.netgamers.org) | |
2014-12-06 10:57:29 <B-Butch3r> yo | |
2014-12-06 11:04:38 <B-Butch3r> Effs are more or less started at | |
2014-12-06 11:04:49 <B-Butch3r> They are pretty close to what i was thinking it would look like | |
2014-12-06 11:05:03 <B-Butch3r> With 6 classes, having 13 pods makes no sense. Make it 12 (M0RPH3US is right, remove Xan Bs), and turn Etd Fr into Fi. | |
2014-12-06 11:05:26 <B-Butch3r> I want more than just defenders as the only anti FI for a BS alliance | |
2014-12-06 11:05:46 <B-Butch3r> Thats why i have xan as a BS option | |
2014-12-06 11:05:52 <B-Butch3r> Will people build xan BS? | |
2014-12-06 11:06:09 <B-Butch3r> Im not sure, xan players like to play slow hull researching | |
2014-12-06 11:06:17 <B-Butch3r> and most of the xans usualy dont have capital hulls for mid round | |
2014-12-06 11:06:56 <B-Butch3r> Very few alliances, if any, has enough displine within their ranks to do a 100% strat | |
2014-12-06 11:07:26 <B-Butch3r> Putting in temptations to go for some solo effort was my idea of these stats | |
2014-12-06 11:08:19 <B-Butch3r> with the new goverment changes, the greed factor of PA has been heavy reduced, not going for capital hulls early on should punish you in the same way not going for TT early does | |
2014-12-06 11:09:03 <B-Butch3r> So there not being any in eta def for xan fr is okey, it will push the players to rethink what they are researching | |
2014-12-06 11:09:32 <B-Butch3r> On that note, perhaps the xan FR emp resistance has to be played around with, atm its at average 176% to vipers | |
2014-12-06 11:10:04 <B-Butch3r> maybe it needs to be 180%+ | |
2014-12-06 11:10:16 <B-Butch3r> Kaiba says FI is too strong | |
2014-12-06 11:10:21 <B-Butch3r> Blue_esper says BS is too strong | |
2014-12-06 11:10:27 <B-Butch3r> Isil says CO is too strong | |
2014-12-06 11:10:54 <B-Butch3r> So i think im close to some sort of balance | |
2014-12-06 11:10:55 <B-Butch3r> ... | |
2014-12-06 11:11:13 <B-Butch3r> A problem with Co in general is that all ships either hug or steal, making its inits entirely inconsequential. | |
2014-12-06 11:11:25 <B-Butch3r> good point to the people saying CO is too strong, it dosnt kill anything | |
2014-12-06 11:12:12 <B-Butch3r> ... | |
2014-12-06 11:12:13 <B-Butch3r> The Guardian is an interesting idea, but with Cr being as well rounded as it is, stealing Cr with the Guardian would actually annoy me as a Cat player, because it upsets my fleet balance and gets me nothing in return. | |
2014-12-06 11:12:20 <B-Butch3r> I tried making cath a strong choice | |
2014-12-06 11:12:46 <B-Butch3r> on the flipside i dont want to make it too strong, either id leave out the guardian or have it as steal | |
2014-12-06 11:13:11 <B-Butch3r> You cant get both good EMP efficient, and kill ships imho | |
2014-12-06 11:13:33 <B-Butch3r> Stealing shit you dont want to steal is usualy a reason for not building steal ships | |
2014-12-06 11:13:57 <B-Butch3r> ...Outside of Xan, there's only 1 T1 anti-De ship. | |
2014-12-06 11:14:02 <B-Butch3r> that is on purpose | |
2014-12-06 11:14:07 <B-Butch3r> FR being as strong as it is | |
2014-12-06 11:14:33 <B-Butch3r> its to make DE better, without playing around with fundamental inits and targetting | |
2014-12-06 11:15:15 <B-Butch3r> ... | |
2014-12-06 11:15:23 <B-Butch3r> On the point on zik being underpowered | |
2014-12-06 11:15:42 <B-Butch3r> I dont see how to do anything with it without playing around with the fundamentals of the targetting | |
2014-12-06 11:16:01 <B-Butch3r> Im trying to give it small superpowers few realise | |
2014-12-06 11:16:03 <B-Butch3r> like the dagger | |
2014-12-06 11:16:12 <B-Butch3r> and some super res stealer in class | |
2014-12-06 11:16:48 <B-Butch3r> ... | |
2014-12-06 11:16:49 <B-Butch3r> In these stats, where Fr has to hit 5 classes, Etd Fr is missing a target. Is that an oversight or intentional? If the latter, I'd be interested in hearing what it is. | |
2014-12-06 11:16:56 <B-Butch3r> Yes it has it purpose | |
2014-12-06 11:17:16 <B-Butch3r> FR will only be good within forts, or with enough defenders to freeze FI incs | |
2014-12-06 11:18:02 <B-Butch3r> If alliances cant get their players to go for ETD in a FR strat | |
2014-12-06 11:18:11 <B-Butch3r> they will have a hard hard time unless they are forting | |
2014-12-06 11:18:51 <B-Butch3r> and who wants to go for a race wich attack class you will be using has big holes in it? | |
2014-12-06 12:54:14 <mz> holycrapwalloftext | |
2014-12-06 12:54:55 <mz> it would be better to reply on PAF | |
2014-12-06 12:55:05 <mz> so that everyone can see your intentions with the stats, not just me | |
2014-12-06 13:47:11 <B-Butch3r> Useless ship list: Interceptor (fires after both Fr fleets) War Cruiser (Dragon in roiding fleet fulfills same task), Torpedo (fires after both De fleets and the Fi fleet, see fix above), Dagger (bad init, off class) and Clipper (stealing Bs is bad). | |
2014-12-06 13:47:18 <B-Butch3r> Useless ships War Cruiser? | |
2014-12-06 13:47:22 <B-Butch3r> and Dagger? | |
2014-12-06 13:47:31 <B-Butch3r> If there is someone building war cruiser, cus of its high efficiency | |
2014-12-06 13:47:41 <B-Butch3r> those cath/ziks covopping will have a laugh | |
2014-12-06 13:47:56 <B-Butch3r> or if they can steal one of them | |
2014-12-06 13:48:09 <B-Butch3r> and dagger they have so high EMP resistance | |
2014-12-06 13:48:15 <B-Butch3r> they are ace for flak | |
2014-12-06 13:52:52 <mz> but they are not in the roiding fleet, so no one will build them | |
2014-12-06 13:55:58 <B-Butch3r> well need to make em silly effective | |
2014-12-06 13:56:03 <B-Butch3r> For a FR fort alliance | |
2014-12-06 13:56:07 <B-Butch3r> why would you not build em? | |
2014-12-06 13:56:27 <B-Butch3r> a smaller ammount will force a recall | |
2014-12-06 13:57:02 <B-Butch3r> i can nerph dragons attack to make it even more obvious | |
2014-12-06 13:57:35 <B-Butch3r> and for daggers | |
2014-12-06 13:57:40 <B-Butch3r> i can up the EMP resistance even further | |
2014-12-06 13:58:30 <mz> Dec 06 10:38:08 <@mz> I'm more and more convinced that having non-roiding class ships in the stats /at all/ is bad | |
2014-12-06 13:59:06 <B-Butch3r> Well you cant look at the stats all a4 all the time can you | |
2014-12-06 13:59:12 <B-Butch3r> if there is no room for doing variatons | |
2014-12-06 13:59:19 <B-Butch3r> outside the roid class shit | |
2014-12-06 13:59:24 <B-Butch3r> PA would be boring | |
2014-12-06 14:00:12 <B-Butch3r> It shouldnt be 2-3 choice you ahve to go to be good | |
2014-12-06 14:00:41 <B-Butch3r> If you want to make a ships "imbalanced" you have to do it out of roiding class | |
2014-12-06 14:00:55 <B-Butch3r> and not make it a defensive ship | |
2014-12-06 14:01:32 <B-Butch3r> Its like, most stats, out of roiding class are either totaly useless | |
2014-12-06 14:01:38 <B-Butch3r> or super overpowered | |
2014-12-06 14:02:16 <B-Butch3r> Having something that makes you immune against EMP, even though it dosnt aim at anythign freezing you makes the game more down to tactics | |
2014-12-06 14:02:33 <B-Butch3r> outflaking is/was a part of the game to deal with EMP | |
2014-12-06 14:03:05 <B-Butch3r> why not enable it with making a ship wich at first glance would only serve as a flak ship | |
2014-12-06 14:03:20 <B-Butch3r> (though it save zik from ETD/ZIK fr) | |
2014-12-06 14:03:46 <B-Butch3r> my stats have a lot of these small bits of tactical options, if you care to read em closely | |
2014-12-06 14:04:30 <B-Butch3r> Nobody has yet to say that DE is overpowered | |
2014-12-06 14:04:40 <B-Butch3r> but look at the efficient on it | |
2014-12-06 14:05:11 <B-Butch3r> and the fact that it to some extent nullifies both xan and etd DE | |
Session Close: Sat Dec 06 21:48:42 2014 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment