Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Nevraeka
Last active September 28, 2019 19:01
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Nevraeka/bfa680d2443e64ea7f64b38fa2400aa6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Nevraeka/bfa680d2443e64ea7f64b38fa2400aa6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
When you load css bundle asyncronously this can happen:
>> FYI- bundling assets is a separate issue from CSS core features
1) it load:
.class-3 { color: green; }
<div class="class-3">
2) it load
.class-1 { color: red; }
.class-2 { color: blue; }
<div class="class-1 class-2"> this works correctly
3) you load a new component but the style are not what you expect
<div class="class-2 class-3"> class 3 is overwritten by class-2
>> As I would expect - order & specificity are core to CSS intentionally. This comes to designer considerations for the CSS developer but can be predicted
One design solution is to utilize a BEM pattern with single selectors in your css.
### BEM Proposal
```scss
.my_color {
&--green {
color: green;
}
&--red {
color: red;
}
&--blue {
color: blue;
}
}
```
```html
<div class="my_color--blue"></div>
```
The above example yields this CSS...
```css
.my_color--green {
color: green;
}
.my_color--red {
color: red;
}
.my_color--blue {
color: blue;
}
```
Even in web app where there is a single css file, dev prefer use mixin to share patterns.
>> Preference should not be assumed here. Additionally, not every web app should have a single file. HTTP 1 optimization has led us to this paradigm of bundling & minifying css (and js) and it will change with the adoption of HTTP2 to favor modular files
Composing classes in html cons:
- depend of code order and specificity
>> core to CSS design and will not be changed. This is something that developers need to understand & embrace
- dev can introduce unintendent inheritance
>> patterns like BEM & single classname selector approaches. This is not an issue in CSS though.
- mutation is in multiple places with no source of truth, combination generated are not clear
>> What does this mean specifically?
- refactoring is diffuclt if the piece of html is across the entire website
>> core to CSS design which is the Cascade. This is something that, like order & specificity, should be account for in application development with CSS
Using sass mixin pros:
- css abstraction is in css
- css dependencies is in css
>> not sure what is meant here
- one source of truth
>> not necessarily true without sourcemapping. I think this is not neceessarily a pro or a con though
- Developer tooling (built in linting, mixin functionality, maps, loops, frameworks & libraries)
cons:
- duplicate a lot of line of code
>> only if you design your SCSS in that way. A BEM approach, for instance can utilize SCSS nesting without this issue.
- precompile step
- build dependencies requirements and complexity (webpack, gulp, node, ruby, etc)
>> not always but increases complexity & learning curve in many cases
Solution written is sass work for single css file you cannot do it with async css loading
>> Precompiling renders to a static css file usually in a build step but definitely before the HTML page is sent. I am not sure what you mean by async CSS.
>> For arguments sake, assume these mixins...
```scss
@mixin pattern-1(){
color: green;
}
@mixin pattern-2(){
color: red;
}
@mixin pattern-3(){
color: blue;
}
```
### Example 1:
```scss
.class-3 { @include pattern-3(); }`
```
```html
<div class="class-3">`
```
The above code yields the following code for `.class-3`...
```css
.class-3 {
color: blue;
}
```
### Example 2
```scss
.class-2 {
@include pattern-1();
color: red;
}
```
```html
<div class="class-2">
```
The above code yields the following code (as expected where the second color rule overrides the first)...
```css
.class-2 {
color: green;
color: red;
}
```
### Example 3
```scss
.class-4 {
@include pattern-2();
@include pattern-3();
}
```
```html
<div class="class-4">
```
The above code yields the following code (as expected where the second color rule overrides the first)...
```css
.class-4 {
color: red;
color: blue;
}
```
>> The mixins work as expected as far as I can see.
>> For performance & reuse optimization in SCSS use @extend with placeholders over included mixins to deduplicate css and create compund selectors (for cases without parameters in mixins)...
Example:
```scss
%my_color {
color: rgba(255,255,255,0);
}
.test {
@extend %my_color;
}
.test2 {
@extend %my_color;
}
```
precompilezs to...
```css
.test,
.test2 {
color: rgba(255,255,255,0);
}
```
The above code outputs to...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment