Is this correct behavior or not? I want to be able to control the logger levels of the separate instances of TestClass, thus they need differing names.

test_ros_named_logger

#include <ros/ros.h> 

class TestClass
{
  public:
	TestClass(const std::string name)
	{
		ROS_INFO_NAMED(name, "This name should be: %s? The same as the logger name in front << ? ", name.c_str());
	}

	~TestClass(){};
	
};

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	ros::init(argc, argv, "Node_Name");
	ros::NodeHandle n;

	TestClass test1("name1");
	TestClass test2("name2");
	TestClass test3("name3");
}


// Output:
$ rosrun rose20_common logger_test
1422528278.730831613|ros.rose20_common.name1[ INFO]: This name should be: name1? The same as the logger name in front << ? 
1422528278.730899707|ros.rose20_common.name1[ INFO]: This name should be: name2? The same as the logger name in front << ? 
1422528278.730919307|ros.rose20_common.name1[ INFO]: This name should be: name3? The same as the logger name in front << ?