Potential bug of Hazelcast,

Starter.java

package com.revolut.interview;

import com.hazelcast.config.Config;
import com.hazelcast.core.Hazelcast;
import com.hazelcast.core.HazelcastInstance;
import com.hazelcast.internal.serialization.impl.ClassDefinitionImpl;
import lombok.Data;
import lombok.EqualsAndHashCode;
import lombok.ToString;

import java.io.Serializable;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;

/**
 * TODO
 *
 * @author Ivan Zemlyanskiy
 */
public class Starter {

    public static final String ACCOUNTS = "accounts";

    public static void main(String[] args) {
//        Config cfg = new Config();
//        HazelcastInstance instance = Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(cfg);
//        Map<Long, Account> mapCustomers = instance.getMap(ACCOUNTS);
        Map<Long, Account> mapCustomers = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

        System.out.println("init");
        mapCustomers.put(1L, new Account(1L, "my"));
        System.out.println("compute");
        mapCustomers.computeIfPresent(1L, (id, account) -> {
            account.setValue(BigDecimal.TEN);
            return account;
        });
        System.out.println("done");

        mapCustomers.values().forEach(System.out::println);
    }

    @Data
    @EqualsAndHashCode
    @ToString
    public static class Account implements Serializable {
        private final long id;
        private final String name;
        private BigDecimal value = BigDecimal.ZERO;
    }

}

This output is

init
compute
done
Starter.Account(id=1, name=my, value=10)

If uncomment 27-29 lines in main method and comment 30 it will be infinity loop with output

init
compute