$(P_0, \dots, P_n)$
The $n$ parties — $(P_0, \dots, P_n)$ , $\ell$
The $n$ parties $(P_0, \dots, P_n)$ , $\ell$
The parties $(P_0, \dots, P_n)$ , $\ell$
$P_0$
$(P_0)$
$(P_0,)$
$(P_0, \dots)$
$(P_0, \dots, )$
$(P_0, \dots, P_n)$
The $n$ parties — $P_0$
The $n$ parties — $(P_0)$
The $n$ parties — $(P_0,)$
The $n$ parties — $(P_0, \dots)$
The $n$ parties — $(P_0, \dots, )$ ?
The $n$ parties — $(P_0, \dots, P_n)$
Within $one$ line every $second$ expression in $\LaTeX$ or $\TeX$ is $not$ rendered? (Nope)
Within $(one)$ line every $(second)$ expression in $(\LaTeX)$ or $(\TeX)$ is $(not)$ rendered?
Within $(P_one)$ line every $(P_second)$ expression in $(P_\LaTeX)$ or $(P_\TeX)$ is $(P_not)$ rendered?
What actually $(P, H, A, P, P, E, N, S)$?
No, really, what $(P_0, H_1, A_2, P_3, P_4, P_5, E_6, N_7, S_8)$?
Is the $n$ to blame? $(P_0, P_1)$
The $n$ parties? $(P_0)$
The $n$ parties in the same sentence $(P_0)$?
The $n$ parties $(P_0, \dots, P_n)$ ?
Looks like that