Navigation Menu

Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@RubenVerborgh
Created March 18, 2019 13:55
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save RubenVerborgh/42bc64dba79048c2598920451b5597f4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save RubenVerborgh/42bc64dba79048c2598920451b5597f4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Reply to no-open review invitation
Dear editor,
Thanks for inviting me as a reviewer.
While the topic is relevant to my expertise,
I only review for journals with an open review process.
As such, I have to decline your invitation.
I believe that, as scientists working for the public,
we should make the output of our scientific processes
publicly and immediately accessible.
Time and time again, it has been proven
that peer review is not effective.
While making the process public might not affect that,
at least it creates an audit trail
the entire world can learn from.
If you consider opening up your review process,
please do not hesitate to contact me again.
Thanks,
Ruben
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment