| --- duplicity 2015-08-19 12:00:48.000000000 +0200 | |
| +++ duplicity 2015-08-19 12:00:43.000000000 +0200 | |
| @@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ | |
| # there is no sign_key and there are recipients | |
| elif (action == "full" | |
| and (globals.gpg_profile.recipients or globals.gpg_profile.hidden_recipients) | |
| - and not globals.gpg_profile.sign_key): | |
| + and not globals.gpg_profile.sign_key | |
| + and not globals.restart): | |
| return "" | |
| # for an inc backup, we don't need a password if |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
You're right. Just stumbled upon this. It'll fail in inc. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This comment has been minimized.
This is also an issue for incremental; will it work with the current logic based on testing for "full"?