Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

What would you like to do?
--- duplicity 2015-08-19 12:00:48.000000000 +0200
+++ duplicity 2015-08-19 12:00:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -158,7 +158,8 @@
# there is no sign_key and there are recipients
elif (action == "full"
and (globals.gpg_profile.recipients or globals.gpg_profile.hidden_recipients)
- and not globals.gpg_profile.sign_key):
+ and not globals.gpg_profile.sign_key
+ and not globals.restart):
return ""
# for an inc backup, we don't need a password if

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@boyanpenkov boyanpenkov commented Aug 19, 2015

This is also an issue for incremental; will it work with the current logic based on testing for "full"?


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Thinkscape Thinkscape commented Sep 10, 2015

You're right. Just stumbled upon this. It'll fail in inc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment