Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created Dec 2, 2022
Embed
What would you like to do?
bisectable6
say :42z ~~ :42a;
Bisecting: 108 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps)
[21829c33f6831cf567663dc91071ea6dd009ed53] Make the adverbless zen-slice (@a[]) a few percent faster
»»»»» Testing 21829c33f6831cf567663dc91071ea6dd009ed53
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d4fde77d2a08d3354c6845b56caaa64e7155eeca
»»»»» Script output:
True
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 36cee696fe867ee48802db17e384181ea7cb858c
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 95d6062334ef4c7534c326174e4eb58dea307e92
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 03065e2967ab6e79be312207acd8613e0a190c3f
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 586f2f3cc703544364c7a2473df30d5c2e53d906
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 026c51a04571af56f414f78664088953bc6f2ff9
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
True
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
026c51a04571af56f414f78664088953bc6f2ff9 is the first new commit
commit 026c51a04571af56f414f78664088953bc6f2ff9
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <github@liz.nl>
Date: Tue Jan 4 14:43:53 2022 +0100
Fix the behaviour of Pair ~~ Pair (#4671)
Apparently, this was borked since d8f7e8b8d6ea25b about 6 years ago.
See discussion at https://logs.liz.nl/moarvm/2021-12-15.html#16:32-0003
This breaks test #177 of t/spec/S02-types/pair.t
src/core.c/Pair.pm6 | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment