(C-x means ctrl+x, M-x means alt+x)
The default prefix is C-b. If you (or your muscle memory) prefer C-a, you need to add this to ~/.tmux.conf
:
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the secure
flag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection.
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying
This post also appears on lisper.in.
Reader macros are perhaps not as famous as ordinary macros. While macros are a great way to create your own DSL, reader macros provide even greater flexibility by allowing you to create entirely new syntax on top of Lisp.
Paul Graham explains them very well in [On Lisp][] (Chapter 17, Read-Macros):
The three big moments in a Lisp expression's life are read-time, compile-time, and runtime. Functions are in control at runtime. Macros give us a chance to perform transformations on programs at compile-time. ...read-macros... do their work at read-time.
The MIT License (MIT) | |
Copyright (c) 2014 Tomas Kafka | |
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy | |
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal | |
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights | |
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell | |
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is | |
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: |
# Hello, and welcome to makefile basics. | |
# | |
# You will learn why `make` is so great, and why, despite its "weird" syntax, | |
# it is actually a highly expressive, efficient, and powerful way to build | |
# programs. | |
# | |
# Once you're done here, go to | |
# http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html | |
# to learn SOOOO much more. |
const I = x => x | |
const K = x => y => x | |
const A = f => x => f (x) | |
const T = x => f => f (x) | |
const W = f => x => f (x) (x) | |
const C = f => y => x => f (x) (y) | |
const B = f => g => x => f (g (x)) | |
const S = f => g => x => f (x) (g (x)) | |
const S_ = f => g => x => f (g (x)) (x) | |
const S2 = f => g => h => x => f (g (x)) (h (x)) |
by Bjørn Friese
Beautiful is better than ugly. Explicit is better than implicit.
I frequently deal with collections of things in the programs I write. Collections of droids, jedis, planets, lightsabers, starfighters, etc. When programming in Python, these collections of things are usually represented as lists, sets and dictionaries. Oftentimes, what I want to do with collections is to transform them in various ways. Comprehensions is a powerful syntax for doing just that. I use them extensively, and it's one of the things that keep me coming back to Python. Let me show you a few examples of the incredible usefulness of comprehensions.