Compare the performance of two javascript message pack implementation: "msgpack5" & "msgpack-lite"

messagepack_performance.js

"use strict";

const msgpack = require('msgpack5')();
const msgpacklite = require("msgpack-lite");
const obj = {name: "jonathan", age: 29, gender: "male"};
const count = 100000;

const try5 = (act) => {
  if (act === "encode") {
    for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      msgpack.encode(obj);
    }
  } else {
    let encoded = msgpack.encode(obj);
    for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      msgpack.decode(encoded);
    }
  }
};

const tryLite = (act) => {
  if (act === "encode") {
    for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      msgpacklite.encode(obj);
    }
  } else {
    let encoded = msgpacklite.encode(obj);
    for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      msgpacklite.decode(encoded);
    }
  }
};

// --------------------------------------------------
const exec = function(func, name, act) {
  let start = new Date();
  func.call(this, act);
  let consumed = new Date() - start;
  console.log(name, act, consumed, "ms");
};

exec(try5, "try5", "encode");
exec(try5, "try5", "decode");
exec(tryLite, "tryLite", "encode");
exec(tryLite, "tryLite", "decode");

// try5 encode 1112 ms
// try5 decode 1077 ms
// tryLite encode 330 ms
// tryLite decode 220 ms