Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Embed
What would you like to do?
Copy of my answer edit to not lose it in case they reject the edit: https://askubuntu.com/questions/253096/low-level-format-of-hard-drive/498797#498797

A Low Level Format (LLF) means redefining physical disk layout. This is not doable by user on today's HDDs and SSDs. One usually want's to perform LLF to securely erase all data, reallocate bad sectors and/or remove malware.


ATA Secure Erase

Allows you to erase data on disk even on reallocated sectors. See:

Below is a copy of the answer, current as of July 16, 2014 as provided by no.human.being et al,

Under unixoid systems you can do it with "hdparm". You need to get "root" first, then do the following. This is assuming that the drive you want to low-level format is "/dev/sda" and that you have "hdparm" installed.

hdparm -I /dev/sda

The parameter is a capital "i", not a lowercase "l", just in case the font is ambiguous. If the drive shows "frozen" you must first "un-freeze" it. What you need to do to "un-freeze" it depends on the device. Most devices will "un-freeze" if you put the system to "suspend to RAM" mode, then wake it up again. If the device shows "not frozen", you can proceed [ed. llformat is just a dummy password].

hdparm --user-master u --security-set-pass llformat /dev/sda

Then show the device info again with the capital "i" as parameter.

hdparm -I /dev/sda

It should now display "enabled" under "Security:". This is quite a critical step. The device is now secured. If you power it down, it will lock and might become inaccessible. When you perform the low-level format NOW, security will be disabled again and you can continue using the device [ed. try --security-erase-enhanced first if your drive supports it].

hdparm --user-master u --security-erase llformat /dev/sda

The device should now be physically wiped.

hdparm -I /dev/sda

Once more with the capital "i". Confirm that security has returned to "not enabled". You can now partition and format the device.

Reallocate bad sectors

Today's HDDs and SSDs reallocate flaky sectors to service areas so that they are no longer visible to the user. How is this done depends on device firmware. Most commonly you can check for sectors that need reallocation using smartctl -x /dev/sdX and check Current_Pending_Sector raw value. Here's more about reading the reallocated sectors related values:

It's so sad that SMART is so poorly understood; I think SMART tells alot about the drive and is the best drive diagnostic available. Sadly, few people know how to interpret the SMART data, and programs that try to interpret for the user do a poor job at it.

Realloacted Sector Count = INVISIBLE bad sectors that have been swapped with reserve sectors. These sectors are NO LONGER VISIBLE to your operating system and as such can NEVER cause any more problems.

Current Pending Sector = ACTIVE VISIBLE bad sectors that CANNOT BE READ but are still visible to the operating system. These are VERY DANGEROUS and cause ALOT of problems!

However, the value 200 you're seeing is a normalized value where the higher = better. You have to look at the RAW VALUE instead! For example, a raw value of 0 reallocated sectors might be the equivalent of a 200 normalized value. If the normalized value drops below the THRESHOLD value, that SMART attribute counts as a FAILURE. So if the normalized value is 200 and the threshold value is 100, that would be perfect, while the normalized value being 98 and the threshold being 100 would mean that attribute signals a FAILURE.

My advice: do not look at the normalized values at all. Only look at the RAW values!

Important SMART attributes:

  • Reallocated Sector Count = bad sectors in the past; this might have caused problems in the past but does not have to; drives replace weak sectors as a precaution which may never have caused any problems.
  • Current Pending Sector = THE MOST DANGEROUS smart attribute; this should ALWAYS BE ZERO or you have severe problems! This can be either weak electric charge with insufficient ECC correction ability -OR- it can be physical damage. Writing to this sector will solve the problem; if there was physical damage it will be realloacted by a reserve sector and the Reallocated Sector Count raw value will increase.
  • UDMA CRC Error Count = cabling errors; if this is higher than 1000 and increasing you have severe cabling problems; under 100 does not need to trigger any alarm. Technically this means the receiving end did receive a corrupted version of the data that was sent by the transmitter; the corruption was detected by CRC which means the data is NOT accepted and the request will be sent again. Unless you see very high values or it keeps increasing steadily, this usually is not a big issue.

The most reliable way to fix those I know is writing zeroes to these sectors. ATA secure erase may not do this. One approach is to thy the diskscan utility.

If you are brave you can try doing manually. For example on a device without useful data, you can do like (DANGEROUS, ONLY DO IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE DOING):

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=1MiB

The above will remove all data from the device irrecoverably! So make sure you select the correct device /dev/sdX. About more fine tuned approach for fixing individual sectors, check also

Handling HPA and DCO

See this superuser answer. For re-scanning the drive when HPA is changed temporarily or permanently, see this blog. In short this is how you re-scan HDD:

# you need to figure out the id from dmesg or by browsing /sys/bus/scsi/devices
echo x > /sys/bus/scsi/devices/6:0:0:0/delete
# wait a bit here as disk will spin down on delete
echo "- - -" >/sys/class/scsi_host/host6/scan

Now check dmesg for the drive detection.

Drive firmware

If you just wanted to remove a malware and you did all of the above you are still not safe. A Malware can be hiding in firmware. You have no chance to know for sure whether anything is in there and whether it is overwritten even if you re-install firmware. So to be 100% safe, you need a new drive. Wait.. do you trust your supplier 100%?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.