Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@alkamin
Last active May 13, 2021 17:05
Show Gist options
  • Save alkamin/3a261b731c98e45aeee2efe42feb7dd2 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save alkamin/3a261b731c98e45aeee2efe42feb7dd2 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

STAC Item Extended Metadata

The size of the properties of a STAC item can greatly impact it's usefulness and searchability. On one hand, having the smallest set of useful metadata for search and indexing helps keep search indices performant and limits the size of the index as a collection grows. On the other hand, when additional useful metadata is available in a difficult or tedious to parse form (XML for example), deferring the parsing of the metadata to the consumer can greatly increase the effort required to make use of the data. This dichotomy presents the need for an additional metadata container which will allows for producers to pre-parse potentially useful metadata while avoiding a set of item properties that becomes too large to manage.

The STAC item extended metadata object seeks to solve this by standardizing a structure that can contain the extended metadata in JSON format and be provided as an asset within an item.

The motivating work for this can be found in this PR to stactools which started with a large amount of metadata in an item in order to offload XML parsing from consumers.

Metadata asset item (in parent item)

Field Name Type Description
href string REQUIRED. Link to the metadata file. Relative and absolute links are both allowed.
type string application/json
roles string[] [extended-item, metadata]

Extended metadata file format

This object is similar to a STAC item's shape, but differs in that there is no geometry or assets.

Properties

Field Name Type Description
stac_version string REQUIRED. The STAC version the parent item implements.
stac_extensions string A list of extensions the parent Item implements (which influences which properties will be available).
id string REQUIRED. Should match the id of the parent item
properties Properties Object REQUIRED. A dictionary of metadata for the item. Should contain all properties found in the parent item plus all other metadata the producer wishes to provide
links Link Object[] REQUIRED. A list of link items. A rel=extends link and a rel=self link are required.

Notes

  • It is assumed that the parent link would point to the fully qualified STAC item with the same id
  • The rel=extends avoids possible conflation with other usage of rel=parent as parents are typically collections or catalogs
  • The parent item MUST provide all required fields that apply to all advertised extensions as well those that are part of the common metadata standard. An item with extended metadata should still pass validation without the sidecar file.
  • All properties that are in the parent item MUST also be present in the extended metadata object. This will allow for simpler implementations where property merging is never necessary because the extended metadata object would provide a complete set of properties

Questions

  • Assuming the adoption of stac_types, what would be an appropriate type for this metadata object? Should it have one?

Example item and extended metadata object

Some parts of the item have been abbreviated.

Item:

{
  "type": "Feature",
  "stac_version": "1.0.0-beta.2",
  "id": "S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE",
  "properties": {
    "constellation": "Sentinel 2",
    "platform": "Sentinel-2B",
    "instruments": ["msi"],
    "providers": [
      {
        "name": "ESA",
        "roles": ["producer", "processor", "licensor"],
        "url": "https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/home"
      }
    ],
    "eo:cloud_cover": 99.99889,
    "sat:relative_orbit": 71,
    "sat:orbit_state": "DESCENDING",
    "datetime": "2019-12-28T21:05:19.024000Z"
  },
  "geometry": {
    "type": "Polygon",
    "coordinates": [
      [
        [178.46576196102689, -72.04011355537793],
        [178.27681548937534, -72.16336432923073],
        [178.06718309702956, -72.29807444206813],
        [177.8546048239221, -72.43254466779305],
        [177.63897698625422, -72.56683742809686],
        [177.52660011984892, -72.63590692252626],
        [177.41619277127006, -72.70362861528113],
        [177.19470381343066, -72.83771185638467],
        [177.13710590540074, -72.87204580110038],
        [176.97420853049607, -72.96895511088094],
        [176.933169584365, -72.99296585548929],
        [176.86462378607973, -72.99147346472603],
        [177.18934036156338, -72.01247788750499],
        [178.46576196102689, -72.04011355537793]
      ]
    ]
  },
  "links": [
    {
      "rel": "license",
      "href": "https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice"
    },
    {
      "rel": "self",
      "href": "./S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE.json",
      "type": "application/json"
    }
  ],
  "assets": {
    "extended-metadata": {
      "href": "./S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE.metadata.json",
      "type": "application/json",
      "roles": ["extended-item", "metadata"]
    }
    // ...
  },
  "bbox": [
    176.86462378607973,
    -72.99296585548929,
    178.46576196102689,
    -72.01247788750499
  ],
  "stac_extensions": ["eo", "sat"]
}

Extended metadata:

{
  "stac_version": "1.0.0-beta.2",
  "stac_extensions": [
    "eo",
    "sat"
  ],
  "id": "S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE",
  "links": [
    {
      "rel": "self",
      "href": "./S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE.metadata.json",
      "type": "application/json"
    },
    {
      "rel": "extends",
      "href": "./S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE.json",
      "type": "application/json"
    }
  ],
  "properties": {
    "constellation": "Sentinel 2",
    "platform": "Sentinel-2B",
    "instruments": [
      "msi"
    ],
    "s2:generationTime": "2020-10-03T10:46:58.860Z",
    "s2:datatakeIdentifier": "GS2B_20191228T210519_014683_N02.12",
    "s2:datastripIdentifier": "S2B_OPER_MSI_L2A_DS_ESRI_20201003T104659_S20191228T210521_N02.12",
    "s2:granuleIdentifier": "S2B_OPER_MSI_L2A_TL_ESRI_20201003T104659_A014683_T01CCV_N02.12",
    "s2:datatakeType": "INS-NOBS",
    "s2:mgrsTile": "01CCV",
    "s2:processingBaseline": "02.12",
    "s2:productURI": "S2B_MSIL2A_20191228T210519_N0212_R071_T01CCV_20201003T104658.SAFE",
    "s2:productType": "S2MSI2A",
    "s2:cloudCoverageAssessment": 99.99889,
    "s2:meanSolarZenith": 55.201271439448,
    "s2:meanSolarAzimuth": 52.614268815742,
    "s2:reflectanceConversionFactor": 1.03382780603275,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB01": 10.9693522443217,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB01": 303.825599018102,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB09": 10.9975598362208,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB09": 304.325095060087,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB10": 10.8405799347113,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB10": 301.064410698346,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB02": 10.7985970063199,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB02": 299.520631476454,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB03": 10.822233080032,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB03": 300.497757463677,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB04": 10.8507073259669,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB04": 301.398604018607,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB05": 10.8687158186137,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB05": 301.880666343481,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB06": 10.8888434410565,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB06": 302.374527614989,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB07": 10.9204140720004,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB07": 302.874609684129,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB08": 10.8094588480691,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB08": 300.008008590281,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB8A": 10.9442443310732,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB8A": 303.366040038463,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB11": 10.8845308415639,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB11": 302.24300991018,
    "s2:meanIncidenceZenithAngleB12": 10.9485408965834,
    "s2:meanIncidenceAzimuthAngleB12": 303.42008542786,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB01": 1874.3,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB02": 1959.75,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB03": 1824.93,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB04": 1512.79,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB05": 1425.78,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB06": 1291.13,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB07": 1175.57,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB08": 1041.28,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB8A": 953.93,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB09": 817.58,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB10": 365.41,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB11": 247.08,
    "s2:solarIrradianceB12": 87.75,
    "providers": [
      {
        "name": "ESA",
        "roles": [
          "producer",
          "processor",
          "licensor"
        ],
        "url": "https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/home"
      }
    ],
    "eo:cloud_cover": 99.99889,
    "sat:relative_orbit": 71,
    "sat:orbit_state": "DESCENDING",
    "datetime": "2019-12-28T21:05:19.024000Z"
  }
}
@m-mohr
Copy link

m-mohr commented Feb 24, 2021

Great, I've changed the wording there to indicate that parent items must contain all properties relevant to extensions and the common metadata. The point about an item with extended metadata being able to be validated without involving the sidecar file is something I hadn't considered but seems like a big deal.

Maybe also add that the parent item should include all metadata that you expect people to search on (using API queries). Otherwise items may not be found...

Another issue with the requirement is maybe that some extensions don't require a specific field but just require at least one property to be available. That could be confusing for implementors. (I'm wondering whether it would be good to say that extensions should be either fully in the parent item or the extended-item? I'm not sure though that this would work in practice...)

@alkamin
Copy link
Author

alkamin commented Feb 24, 2021

Another issue with the requirement is maybe that some extensions don't require a specific field but just require at least one property to be available. That could be confusing for implementors. (I'm wondering whether it would be good to say that extensions should be either fully in the parent item or the extended-item? I'm not sure though that this would work in practice...)

It sounds like best-practice might be to require that the parent item pass validation as a stand-alone STAC item. That being said, I'm not sure of the state of "official" validators and thus not sure that it would be useful guidance to say "It should validate!"

@cholmes
Copy link

cholmes commented May 13, 2021

Did this ever evolve more? It'd be great to get this to be in https://github.com/stac-extensions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment