Created
August 15, 2012 05:56
-
-
Save andkerosine/3356675 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Haskell-like list comprehensions in Ruby
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
$stack, $draws = [], {} | |
def method_missing *args | |
return if args[0][/^to_/] | |
$stack << args.map { |a| a or $stack.pop } | |
$draws[$stack.pop(2)[0][0]] = args[1] if args[0] == :< | |
end | |
class Array | |
def +@ | |
$stack.flatten! | |
keys = $draws.keys & $stack | |
draws = $draws.values_at *keys | |
comp = draws.shift.product(*draws).map do |draw| | |
$stack.map { |s| draw[keys.index s] rescue s }.reduce do |val, cur| | |
op = Symbol === cur ? [:send, :method][val.method(cur).arity] : :call | |
val.send op, cur | |
end | |
end | |
$stack, $draws = [], {} | |
Symbol === last ? comp.select(&pop) : comp | |
end | |
def -@ | |
case map(&:class).index Range | |
when 0 then first.to_a | |
when 1 then [first] + last.step(last.min.ord - first.ord).to_a | |
else self | |
end | |
end | |
end | |
foo =+ [x * y | x <- [1..3], y <- [4..6]] | |
# [4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 12, 15, 18] | |
bar =+ [a + b | a <- ['n','p'..'t'], b <- %w[a i u e o]] | |
# ["na", "ni", "nu", "ne", "no", "pa", "pi", "pu", "pe", "po", "ra", "ri", "ru", "re", "ro", "ta", "ti", "tu", "te", "to"] | |
baz =+ [i ** 2 / 3 | i <- [3,6..100], :even?] | |
# [12, 48, 108, 192, 300, 432, 588, 768, 972, 1200, 1452, 1728, 2028, 2352, 2700, 3072] | |
quux =+ [s.size.divmod(2) | s <- %w[Please do not actually use this.]] | |
# [[3, 0], [1, 0], [1, 1], [4, 0], [1, 1], [2, 1]] |
+1 for "Raskell". Pun in "Rascal"?
Awesome job! ❤️ Gem it please?
"Haskell-like" without lambdas?
Even if it doesn't look as much like Haskell, this snippet is much closer to the Haskell principles, without abusing Ruby.
foo = ->(x=(1..3), y=(4..6)){x.flat_map{|a| y.map{|b| a*b}}}.call
(Of course you usually wouldn't need to call any lambdas before actually executing the application)
Nice but for Ruby I prefer using Ruby syntax:
(1..3).zip(4..6).map { |a, b| a * b }
I'd humbly like to up-vote the previous comment.
Impressive.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I played a bit with the idea to get that. Trying out ruby2 refinements. Too lazy for the "|" support but can do conditions.
https://gist.github.com/freakhill/5564328