Last active
August 29, 2015 14:00
-
-
Save apeiros/11392469 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
What's wrong in crypto - compare
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
### The stuff to encrypt | |
data = 'hello world!' | |
password = 'test123' | |
# Note: all 3 implementations are supposed to do exactly the same | |
### Raw OpenSSL | |
# Decisions, decisions, decisions... | |
cipher = 'AES-256-CBC' # which ciphers are not trivially broken? | |
salt_length = 64 # what's a good length? | |
key_length = 64 # what's a good length? | |
digest_length = 40 # found experimentally | |
iterations = 20_000 # taken the number from the docs - how do I know what's a good number? | |
# Implementation | |
cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.new(cipher) | |
salt = SecureRandom.random_bytes(salt_length) | |
key = OpenSSL::PKCS5.pbkdf2_hmac_sha1(password, salt, iterations, key_length) | |
iv = cipher.random_iv | |
cipher.encrypt | |
cipher.key = key | |
cipher.iv = iv | |
encrypted = cipher.update(data)+cipher.final | |
digest = OpenSSL::HMAC.hexdigest(OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1.new, key, encrypted) | |
# And now, where do I store iv, digest and salt? | |
### Ruby on Rails 4.1 (http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveSupport/MessageEncryptor.html) | |
require 'active_support/message_encryptor' | |
salt = SecureRandom.random_bytes(64) | |
key = ActiveSupport::KeyGenerator.new(password).generate_key(salt) | |
crypt = ActiveSupport::MessageEncryptor.new(key) | |
encrypted = crypt.encrypt_and_sign(data) # Better, takes care of storing salt, iv and digest in the encrypted data | |
### How I think it should be, because there's a close to zero chance to fuck things up on my end | |
require 'encryption' # https://gist.github.com/apeiros/11374740 | |
encrypted = Encryption.encrypt(data: data, password: password) # Why should it be any more complicated than this? Seriously? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment