Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@baphled
Created July 23, 2011 22:38
Show Gist options
  • Save baphled/1101963 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save baphled/1101963 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Jasmine config to compile coffeescript and copy assets files for testing
# Needed if you are not requiring rails/all
require 'sprockets/railtie'
#
# Would be nice to have this set within jasmine.yml.
#
config.assets.precompile += %w( application.js form.js frontend.js *.css )
# spec/javascripts/support/jasmine_config.rb
# when jasmine starts the server out-of-process, it needs this in order to be able to invoke the asset tasks
unless Object.const_defined?(:Rake)
require 'rake'
load File.expand_path('../../../../Rakefile', __FILE__)
end
module Jasmine
class Config
include Rake::DSL
def js_files(spec_filter = nil)
# remove all generated files
generated_files_directory = File.expand_path("../generated", __FILE__)
# @TODO actually remove generated specs
#
# Think we need to include the rake DSL to make use of rm_rf now
#
rm_rf generated_files_directory, :secure => true
precompile_app_assets
compile_jasmine_javascripts
# this is code from the original jasmine config js_files method - you could also just alias_method_chain it
spec_files_to_include = spec_filter.nil? ? spec_files : match_files(spec_dir, [spec_filter])
src_files.collect {|f| "/" + f } + helpers.collect {|f| File.join(spec_path, f) } + spec_files_to_include.collect {|f| File.join(spec_path, f) }
end
private
# this method compiles all the same javascript files your app will
def precompile_app_assets
puts "Precompiling assets..."
# make sure the Rails environment is loaded
::Rake.application['environment'].invoke
# temporarily set the static assets location from public/assets to our spec directory
#
# This line is now redundant as sprockets does not use static_root to store assets any more
#
#::Rails.application.config.assets.static_root = Rails.root.join("spec/javascripts/generated/assets")
# Sprockets seems to think that assets always belong in the public directory
# Though it's a bit hackish we remove the assets from the public directory after we're done
#
# Would be nicer if sprockets allowed for a way for us to precompile our assets in the generated directory
# Thats something to look into for later.
#
::Rake.application['assets:clean'].reenable
::Rake.application['assets:clean'].invoke
# rake won't let you run the same task twice in the same process without re-enabling it
# once the assets have been cleared, recompile them into the spec directory
::Rake.application['assets:precompile'].reenable
::Rake.application['assets:precompile'].invoke
end
# this method compiles all of the spec files into js files that jasmine can run
def compile_jasmine_javascripts
puts "Compiling jasmine coffee scripts into javascript..."
root = File.expand_path("../../../../spec/javascripts", __FILE__)
destination_dir = File.expand_path("../../generated/specs", __FILE__)
glob = File.expand_path("**/*.coffee", root)
Dir.glob(glob).each do |srcfile|
srcfile = Pathname.new(srcfile)
destfile = srcfile.sub(root, destination_dir).sub(".coffee", "")
FileUtils.mkdir_p(destfile.dirname)
File.open(destfile, "w") {|f| f.write(CoffeeScript.compile(File.new(srcfile)))}
end
end
end
end
# Note - this is necessary for rspec2, which has removed the backtrace
module Jasmine
class SpecBuilder
def declare_spec(parent, spec)
me = self
example_name = spec["name"]
@spec_ids << spec["id"]
backtrace = @example_locations[parent.description + " " + example_name]
parent.it example_name, {} do
me.report_spec(spec["id"])
end
end
end
end
@baphled
Copy link
Author

baphled commented Sep 15, 2011

Hmm, that's annoying, it could be down to the gems you have installed, could you copy your gem list here?

As far as using something other than backbone-rails, I'm not sure, it seems that the issue is more to do with your env not being able to find jasmine for one reason or another. I guess you could skate around the issue, as I did initially and just use icanhazjs to or something similar to deal with your templating issues, but I think you'll find yourself facing this issue again once your views start to build up and get more complex.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment